Communal Riots 2019: Communal Discourse Raging On in India
Irfan
Engineer, Neha Dabhade, Suraj Nair
(Secular
Perspective February 1-15, 2020)
Attitudinal
violence and structural violence contribute immensely to physical violence in
the forms of communal riots and mob lynching. This was the scenario facing India
in 2019. There were 25 incidents of communal riots in India in 2019 and 108
incidents of mob lynching, according to the monitoring of centre for Study of
Society and Secularism (CSSS). CSSS monitors reportage of communal riots and mob
lynching in the Mumbai editions of five leading newspapers- The Indian Express,
The Hindu, Times of India, Inquilab and Sahafat. As per the reportage in these
newspapers, the number of communal riots in 2019 (25) is lesser than 2018 where
38 communal riots were reported in the same newspapers.
Though
the number of communal riots has declined, the discourse of communal violence
driven by ideology of Hindu supremacismremains the same. Newer issues are being
used to heighten the discourse of communal violence- for instance the
discriminatory legislation of Citizenship Amendment Bill which excludes Muslims
linked with NRC, the abrogation of article 370 in Kashmir and the clamp down on
communication subsequently, the demand for construction of Ram Temple in
Ayodhya. Thus, though it appears that the number of communal riots has declined,
that in no way can be construed as decline in communal discourse leading to
communal violence itself. If at all, through discriminatory legislations and
increasing dismantling of democratic institutions which were expected to
safeguard democracy, communal violence is taking deeper roots in our society.
The discourse promoted by the ruling party in conjunction with the impunity and
patronage given to police and non state cadre is effectively perpetrating
violenceagainst the marginalized. Even if the number of communal riots is low,
communal violence has stronger manifestations in structural and attitudinal
violence.
Methodology
of Monitoring:
The
findings of Centre for Study of Society and Secularism (CSSS) are based on the
reportage of communal riots reported in Mumbai editions of five newspapers- The
Indian Express, The Times of India, The Hindu, Sahafat and Inquilab. This is
also the limitation of the findings since they are based on the city editions of
only these five newspapers. In the past, CSSS could give a fair comparison
between the number of communal riots emerging from its monitoring and the number
of communal riots reported by the National Crimes Report Bureau (NCRB) which
used to routinely place this data in the public domain. It’s interesting to note
that though theMinister
of State for Home Affairs G Kishan Reddy claimed that the Centre has zero
tolerance for incidents of communal violence, it
hasn’t proved this claim through figures and stopped giving out data
(Scroll in,
2019) . The NCRB ceasing to publish data of the communal riots
from 2017 is no mere coincidence.In the past, the number of communal riots
reported by the NCRB or the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) was way higher than
that reported by CSSS.
Sections:
Communal riots and Mob Lynching
As
explained last year in its report, CSSS reported that though there is a decline
in the number of communal riots in India in 2018, it doesn’t imply that there is
a decline in communal violence(Engineer, Dabhade, Nair, & Pendke,
2019) . Communal violence is a broader term encompassing communal
riots as well as mob lynching. While the number of communal riots is declining
according to the reportage in the Mumbai edition of these five newspapers, the
number of mob lynching is increasing. Mob lynching is an instrument to achieve
the objective of sustained communal polarization by involving communal symbols
like cow, the issue of love jihad or even the more innocuous pretexts like theft
etc targeting the Muslims. In 2019 too, the same pattern continued where though
the number of communal riots decreased, the number of mob lynching were high.
Thus the report of communal violence which manifested itself in the form of
physical violence is divided into two sections: Communal riots and Mob
lynching.
This
section will attempt to understand the salient features of communal riots in
2019.
Salient
points:
Religion
wise break up of deaths and injuries:
In
2019, from 1st January to 31st December, according to the
abovementioned newspapers, 25 communal riots took place in 2019. In these 25
riots, 8lives were claimed. Out of the 8 persons deceased, three killed were
Hindus, three killed were Muslims and the communities of two persons killed were
not specified in the reports. The two Hindus were killed in Maharashtra and UP.
In the communal riot in Maharashtra, a fight broke out between the two groups
which got a communal angle. The fight broke out during a game of gambling in the
Amravati resulting in the death of one Shamphelwan. A riot ensued and
subsequently two Muslims were killed in the riots. In the Muzzafarnagar district
of Uttar Pradesh, again, a personal conflict over a trivial issue of kite flying
between some children assumed the communal colour. Both sides confronted each
other and one group entered the house of the deceased, Raj Kumar and attacked
him and other family members. Raj Kumar got critically injured in the clash and
later died while being taken to hospital. One Vishnu Yadav died after being
attacked over the issue of stone pelting during a procession of immersion of
some idolsin Bihar’s district of Jehanabad. One more Muslim, JamiruddinTapadar
died in Hailakandi, Assam. This riot was resulting from a traffic congestion
caused due to Friday prayers. 54 persons were injured in these 25 incidents of
communal riots.
Graph
1: Religion wise break up of deaths and injuries:
Religion
wise break up of Arrests:
In
25 incidents of communal riots, there were a total of 48 arrests. 47 of the
arrested from 48 arrests were from unspecified community whereas one was a
Muslim. There were no arrests of specifically any Hindu.
Graph
2: Religion wise break up of Arrests:
Region
wise break up of communal riots:
The
state of Uttar Pradesh continued to top the list of states which had the most
number of communal riots. Out of 25 communal riots, 9 took place in UP. This is
contrary to the claim of the Chief Minister of UP who claimed that there have
been no communal riots in UP after BJP came to rule
(Times of India,
2019) . UP was followed by the state of Maharashtra where 4
communal riots were reported in 2019.
Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Jammu and Kashmir each had two communal
riots in 2019. In the states of Karnataka, Haryana, Assam, Delhi, Bihar and West
Bengal reported one communal riot each.
These
figures indicate that communal riots have mostly been reported in the northern
zone of the country and the north has been the theatre of violence with deep
faultlines. The western zone of the country has been prone to communal violence
traditionally. Interestingly, though no communal riots from Gujarat were
reported in the Mumbai editions of the five newspapers, the local newspapers in
Gujarat have reported 9 incidents of communal riots in 2019.
However
it will be misleading to believe that there is little or no menace of communal
violence in the South and Eastern parts of the country only because of the low
number of communal riots reported from these regions. The communal discourse
replete with hatred and hate speeches is very much prevalent in the east and
south. The discourse is infused with newer issues like Citizenship Amendment
Bill, National Register of Citizens, abrogation of article 370 in Kashmir and
the overall narrative of Muslims being disloyal and second class citizens of
India. Such a discourse manifesting in structural and attitudinal violence has
sharply polarized the communities along religious lines.
Graph
3: Region wise break up of communal riots:
Triggers/
Immediate causes:
In
total, nine incidents of communal riots are associated with religious
processions, festivals or celebrations. As observed in the previous few years,
aggressive sloganeering, deliberate loud music to instigate the other
communities, deliberating planning procession routes to clash with other
religious communities has been used as a pretext to trigger communal riots. Out
of the – riots, four took place in the state of UP, two in Rajasthan, one in
Maharashtra, one in Madhya Pradesh and one each in West Bengal and
Bihar.
Graph
4: Triggers/ Immediate causes:
In
2019 too like in 2018, the use of religious processions and festivals has been
instrumental in fomenting communal tensions leading to violence. Out of the 25
communal riots, nine were triggered off by or during religious processions. The
Kanwariyas or the Kavadyatras have been given protection and state patronage in
a way that the State has favoured them. Out of the nine communal riots triggered
due to issues related to religious procession, three took place in UP itself. In
the Badaun district of UP, stone pelting took place during a Kanwariyayatra
which coincided with the timings of Id namaz. The Muslims objected to the loud
religious music played in the yatra which led to the riot. In Agra, members of
Bajrang Dal protested against the Muslims offering the Id namaz on the road. 70
Bajrang Dal members who were not allowed to pass through the road due to the
prayers threatened to recite Hanuman
Chalisa on the road. In Balrampur district of UP, stone pelting took place
during the idol immersion ritual on Dussera over playing of music.
In
2019, in Hingoli district of Maharashtra, the participants in the KavadYatra
came in conflict with a group of Muslims who were together to offer Eid prayers.
The procession had devotional songs playing on speakers. Both the groups started
shouting religious slogans. In Jaipur, Rajasthan, communal riot ensued after a
Haridwar bound bus was pelted by stones by some Muslims and blocked the Delhi
Highway. This was a fall out of the tensions with the Kanwariyas. In Tonk
district of Rajasthan, stones were pelted at a Vijayadashmi procession in the
town, triggering vandalism and arson. Locals staged a sit-in outside the Malpura
police station and refused to burn the effigies of Ravan till their demand for
immediate arrest of the miscreants was met.
In
Shajapur in Madhya Pradesh, stones were pelted on a Muharram procession. During
the violence some two wheelers were set on fire. In Jehanabad,
Bihar,
riot broke out when a stone was
thrown at the procession being taken out for immersion of idols near the Arwal
More. The devotees blamed by-standers belonging to another community for the
same after which both sides indulged in heavy stone-pelting which had left 14
people injured. The riot claimed two lives. Several shops in the area were set
on fire by the rampaging mobs and the situation was brought under control after
prohibitory orders were issued.In PurbaMedinipurin the state of West Bengal,
Christmas celebrations in a Church were disrupted whena group of men entered the
church premises raised slogans "Jai Shree
Ram", attacked about 100 worshippers and vandalised the church and a vehicle
belonging to the pastor. According to police, one was severely injured and
others few had minor injuries and the locals appeared to be associated with the
BJP as per the initial investigation.
Though
religious festivals or processions remain the main reason emerging from the
reportage of communal riots, there are other triggers that have led to communal
riots which are insightful as far as understanding the patterns of communal
riots are concerned. Rumours of cow slaughter/ beef and eve-teasing of women by
members of “other” communities are still triggers for communal riots. However
there is a more overt and aggressively emboldening shift in the pattern where
Muslims are targeted and attacked and told to go to Pakistan, sending a message
that they are second class citizens of the country and don’t belong to India. In
a blatantly shocking incident in Dhamaspur in Gurgaon, members of a Muslim
family and guests who had come to visit them were beaten with sticks and rods,
allegedly by 20-25 men, who barged into their home and attacked them on Holi
evening. The incident took place when some of the accused allegedly approached
the boys from the family, who were playing cricket outside, and demanded that
they “go to Pakistan and play”.
During the attack the family members were beaten up mercilessly and their house
was damaged along with 2 motorbikes and a car. The accused also fled with
valuables from the house. This is not an isolated incident but comes in the wake
of the persistent attacks on individuals across the country demanding them to
chant “Jai Shri Ram” or asking
Muslims to go to Pakistan, especially after the re-election of BJP in general
elections.
Role
of the State:
The
State in its response to communal riots is guided by its ideology of Hindutva or
supremacism based on religion. Muslims and other minorities are targeted by
state and non- state taking cue from the hate speeches of those in power and the
active network of patronage. This has allowed the violent supremacist to wreck
violence with impunity. The police did not only fail to prevent the riots or
bring the culprits to justice, but the police itself have indulged in violence
against the innocent. The response of the police at Jamia in the midst of
protests against the discriminatory CAA was starkly telling of this pattern. In
unprecedented action, the police entered the Jamia Milia Islamia campus in Delhi
on 15th December, 2019 and beat up the students with batons and used
tear gas. The police have reportedly used stun guns used in terrorists
operations to attack students of Jamia in their hostels and libraries leading to
one student losing one of his eyes and other one losing one arm. The police
action at Seelampur was also condemnable. One can’t help but notice that the
police have become a brute force or army of the ruling party and wrecks violence
on innocent students and Muslims whenever ordered to do so with no regard to law
and order. The police indulge in shoddy investigation to allow the culprits to
exploit the loopholes and go scot free.
The
judiciary too has been tardy and not hearing these cases with priority, thereby
delaying and now clearly denying justice. The role of the executive and the
police in Uttar Pradesh has been particularly disturbing given how it has
violently targeted the Muslim community leading to 23 deaths and recovering the
cost of damage from the Muslim community with a vengeance to break the very
morale and backbone of the protest against the CAA.
Instead
of acting as an antidote to hatred and violence, the State has actually turned
against its own citizens and is attacking them in the most brutal. The State has
become so overbearing that it has influenced all arenas of public knowledge and
debates like it has in terms of state institutions. The media especially is
influenced to only present the narrative weaved by the state and achieving this
with whatever means necessary- manipulation of facts and highly partial coverage
of news. Such incredibly biased reportage is shaping the popular imagination of
the country and shrinking the spaces for impartial and objective public
debates.
Conclusion:
2019
sees the brazen communal attitude of the State which is using all its organs to
maintain a highly polarizing communal discourse. This discourse doesn’t depend
on communal riots alone but has in fact found many other forms to seep into the
Indian society. However, the year 2019 ended with re-invigorating energy and
hope when citizens across religious identities came together to put up a
determined and spirited protests to save the constitution of the country in the
face of discriminatory laws pushed by this government matched only by its
brutality to defend these laws. Such unity may be the anti-dote required to
counter communal riots.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Centre
for Study of Society and Secularism
Mumbai.
Comments
Post a Comment