Saturday, September 28, 2013
U.S. Congressional Hearing on Burma
The U.S. Congress has recently conducted a hearing on Burma. You can view this by clicking here.
Thursday, September 5, 2013
Nothing 'peaceful' about demonstrations that breed hatred!
Most news reports coming from Myanmar are bad, often atrocious and painful to read or watch in video. But once in a while some good news reports are also showing up in the media these days. Thanks to the world-wide condemnation of one-sided, anti-Muslim justice in this Buddhist country that has seen unfathomed savagery and crime by the Buddhist mobs, often aided and led by Buddhist monks, security forces and political leaders, in recent days, the Myanmar government has put some criminal elements within its Buddhist community behind the bar. They have been found guilty for crimes that have resulted in internal displacement of some 140,000 Rohingya Muslims inside the Arakan (Rakhine) state, and tens of thousands of other Muslims in other parts of Myanmar, let alone wholesale destruction of Muslim-owned properties, including mosques, schools, orphanages, and hostels. Nothing was spared by the racist savages within the Buddhist community. And yet, as one may recall not a single Buddhist perpetrator of one of the worst crimes of this decade was apprehended or found guilty - well, until very recently. We were shocked at justice in the Mogher Mulluk where the victims - the Muslims of this country - who were terrorized - were the only ones who were jailed and killed for resisting Buddhist-led pogroms. Not a single Buddhist was sentenced for such gruesome murders and destruction.
Things are now changing, or so it seems!
The latest news from the Irrawaddy shows that 4 Rakhine Buddhists have been sentenced to light terms for demonstrating against Rohingya resettlement in the Arakan state. As one may know, the Rohingyas are the original inhabitants of Arakan whose ancestors lived in the contested territory from time immemorial. The racist government there had denied their citizenship since the time of dictator Ne Win, merely because they are Muslims.
I applaud the government action to go after such preachers of intolerance and bigotry inside Myanmar. These Buddhist criminals cannot hide their despicable crimes under the pretext of organizing so-called 'peaceful' demonstration protests. When such demonstrations provide the justification for on-going ethnic cleansing of a vulnerable minority, which Myanmar, esp. the Rakhine state, had amply demonstrated, there is nothing peaceful about such demonstrations, and these criminals that organize must be hunted down like criminal thugs and murderers.
I urge the Thein Sein government for making sure that such demonstrations that breed hatred and intolerance are not tolerated inside Myanmar.
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
Some inspiring stories of Jewish-Muslim cooperation during hard times
In an Internet search I came across a posting which cites a
few examples of Muslim-Jewish cooperation during hard times saving lives of
each other. Here below, I share four examples of Muslims saving Jewish lives
during the World War II. These facts are important not only for the sake of
history but also for creating a world in which people of different faiths can
live together peacefully without intolerance and hatred, which, sadly, have become
norms in certain parts of our world to tarnish our common humanity and/or
heritage.
- In
1930 Albania, a small Balkan country, had a mere 803,000 citizens of which
two hundred were Jewish. In 1943 the Nazis occupied Albania and in an
unprecedented act of defiance the Albanian people refused to hand-over its
Jewish residents. Instead various government agencies gave Jewish families
fake documentation and Jewish refugees from Europe were given sanctuary
(even while under Italian rule).
At a time when the European nations were sending their Jews to
the gas chambers; Albania, the only European country with a Muslim majority,
not only saved its Jewish residents –but absorbed so many European refugees
that the Jewish population grew a staggering 900% during the war.
- Zejneba Hardaga, a Bosnian Muslim lady who lived in
Sarajevo, had been recognised as “Righteous among the Nations” by Israel
for hiding her Jewish neighbor, Josef Kavilio, from the Nazis during the
holocaust.
- Throughout World War
II a small number of Turkish diplomats (such as Necdet Kent, Namık Kemal
Yolga, Selahattin Ülkümen and Behiç Erkin) risked everything to save the
lives of 35,000 European Jews from the Nazi genocide. They were able to
save so many Jews by leveraging Turkey’s neutral stance to pressure the
Nazis into sparing the lives of Turkish Jews residing in Europe, while
simultaneously granting thousands of European Jews fleeing the Nazi
genocide refuge in Turkey
It is no understatement that these diplomats risked everything,
on July 19 1944, the Gestapo ordered that all of the Jews on island of Rhodes
report for deportation, Selahattin Ülkümen, the Turkish Consul General,
instructed the Nazis that Turkey was neutral in the war and demanded they
release every Turkish Jew and out of fear of causing an international incident
the Nazis complied. Ülkümen’s actions saved the lives of 42 Jewish families,
who were quickly evacuated from the island. In response to this humiliation the
Nazis bombed the Turkish Consulate building, killing his pregnant wife. A few
days later Ülkümen was deported by the Nazis to Piraeus, where he spent the
remainder of the war in jail.
- When the Nazis came
for the Iranian Jews living in France, Abdol Hossein Sardari, the Iranian
Consul for Paris, used his position and influence to save the lives of the
Iranian Jews in France. He fabricated a story that Iranian Jews were not
‘real’Jews, but Persians who’d accepted the teachings of Moses centuries
earlier and therefore not subject to Nazi racial law. After months of
intense debate by German racial scientists he’d convinced everyone but
Eichmann who simply declared Sardari’s claim was “the usual Jewish trick”.
However, the delay had given Sardari the one thing he
desperately needed – time. While the experts were debating in Berlin, he issued
as many passports and travel documents as he could to both Iranian and
non-Iranian Jews.
When
Iran signed a peace treaty with the Allies, Sardari was ordered home by his
superiors, an order he did not follow. Stripped of his diplomatic immunity and
status, he risked his life by remaining in France to save Jews, which he
financed with his personal inheritance. By the end of the war as many as 2,000
Jews owed their life to him.
Many such stories of inter-faith cooperation to save the ‘other’
people’s life can be found by searching the internet.
Such stories give us hope and say that all is probably not
lost. There are still decent human beings in our planet who are willing to do
what is morally right and noble.
I hope that one of the days the ethnic cleansing of the Muslims
in Myanmar, including the Rohingya Muslims living in the state of Arakan
(Rakhine), would cease and allow all to live in peace and harmony in this
Buddhist den of intolerance and hatred.
-
You can read more such stories by clicking here.
Sunday, September 1, 2013
The March to Washington – now and then
Last week America
celebrated the 50th anniversary of March to Washington D.C. It was the largest demonstration ever seen in the
nation's capital, and one of the first to have extensive television coverage, where nearly a quarter million marchers demanded civil
and economic rights for Black Americans. On August 28, 1963 Martin Luther King
Jr. delivered his famous speech, ‘I have a dream’ in front of the Lincoln
Memorial with many in the crowd holding banners that read “March on Washington
for Jobs and Freedom”. There, he established
his reputation as one of the greatest orators in American history.
Although African Americans had been legally freed from
slavery, elevated to the status of citizens and the men given full voting
rights at the end of the American Civil War, many continued to face economic
and political repression. A system of legal discrimination, known as Jim Crow,
was pervasive in the American South, ensuring that Black Americans remained
second-class citizens. They experienced discrimination from businesses and
governments, and in some places were prevented from voting through intimidation
and violence. Twenty-one states prohibited interracial marriage.
Even boxer Muhammad Ali, who was to be recognized later
as the greatest athlete of the 20th century, then known as Cassius
Clay, who had by then won six Kentucky Golden Gloves titles, two national
Golden Gloves titles, an Amateur Athletic Union National Title, and the Light
Heavyweight gold medal in the 1960 Summer Olympics in Rome would be refused
service at a "whites-only" restaurant. That was the nature of overt
racism in the USA in the early 1960s!
The year 1963 was particularly tumultuous
with racial unrest and civil rights demonstrations. Nationwide outrage was
sparked by media coverage of police actions in Birmingham, Alabama, where
attack dogs and fire hoses were turned against protestors, many of whom were in
their early teens or younger.
The March on Washington represented a coalition of
several civil rights organizations, all of which generally had different
approaches and different agendas. The stated demands of the march were the passage of meaningful civil
rights legislation; the elimination of racial segregation in public schools;
protection for demonstrators against police brutality; a major public-works
program to provide jobs; the passage of a law prohibiting racial discrimination
in public and private hiring; a $2 an hour minimum wage; and self-government for the District
of Columbia, which had a black majority.
President Kennedy originally discouraged the march, for fear that it might make the legislature vote against civil rights laws in reaction to a perceived threat. Once it became clear that the march would go on, however, he supported it.
President Kennedy originally discouraged the march, for fear that it might make the legislature vote against civil rights laws in reaction to a perceived threat. Once it became clear that the march would go on, however, he supported it.
While
various labor unions supported the march, the AFL-CIO remained neutral.
Outright opposition came from two sides. White supremacist groups, including
the Ku Klux Klan, were obviously not in favor of any event supporting racial
equality. On the other hand, the march was also condemned by some civil rights
activists who felt it presented an inaccurate, sanitized pageant of racial
harmony.
Even
John Lewis who represented the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee planned to give a fiery speech; it called
Kennedy's civil rights bill "too little, too late," asked "which
side is the federal government on?" and declared that they would march
"through the Heart of Dixie, the way Sherman did" and "burn Jim
Crow to the ground—nonviolently." In the end, opposed by other activists, he
agreed to tone down the more inflammatory portions of his speech, but even the
revised version was the most controversial of the day, stating: “The revolution
is at hand, and we must free ourselves of the chains of political and economic
slavery. The nonviolent revolution is saying, ‘We will not wait for the courts
to act, for we have been waiting hundreds of years. We will not wait for the
President, nor the Justice Department, nor Congress, but we will take matters
into our own hands, and create a great source of power, outside of any national
structure that could and would assure us victory.’ For those who have said, ‘Be
patient and wait!’ we must say, ‘Patience is a dirty and nasty word.’ We cannot
be patient, we do not want to be free gradually, we want our freedom, and we
want it now. We cannot depend on any political party, for the Democrats and the
Republicans have betrayed the basic principles of the Declaration of
Independence.”
His
views were more in common with those of Malcolm X than of Martin Luther King
Jr.
Malcolm X, arguably the greatest Afro-American leader, called
the march - the "Farce on Washington." He had seen the hypocritical - ugly and hollow – side of
American democracy that had been preaching democracy all around the world but
denying basic human rights to the people of color. Malcolm
recognized the utter futility of Gandhian non-violence tactic, parroted by Dr.
King, in the face of brutal force. He did not want to see his people being
pushed to the corner and famously said, “We are
nonviolent with people who are nonviolent with us." "Concerning
nonviolence, it is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself when he is the
constant victim of brutal attacks." "If you're not ready to die for
it, put the word 'freedom' out of your vocabulary."
He also said, "I believe that there will ultimately be a clash between
the oppressed and those that do the oppressing. I believe that there will be a
clash between those who want freedom, justice and equality for everyone and
those who want to continue the systems of exploitation." "When
a person places the proper value on freedom, there is nothing under the sun
that he will not do to acquire that freedom. Whenever you hear a man saying he
wants freedom, but in the next breath he is going to tell you what he won't do
to get it, or what he doesn't believe in doing in order to get it, he doesn't
believe in freedom. A man who believes in freedom will do anything under the
sun to acquire . . . or preserve his freedom," Malcolm said.
Malcolm
X did not speak in Washington, but Martin Luther King (MLK), Jr. did. He
started with prepared remarks, saying he was there to "cash a check"
for "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness," while warning
fellow protesters not to "allow our creative protest to degenerate into
physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of
meeting physical force with soul force." But then he departed from his
script, shifting into the "I have a dream" theme he had used on prior
occasions, drawing on both "the American dream" and religious themes,
speaking of an America where his children "will not be judged by the
color of their skin but by the content of their character." He
followed this with an exhortation to "let freedom ring" across the
nation, and concluded with: "And
when this happens, when we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from
every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be
able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men,
Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and
sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "Free at last, free at last.
Thank God Almighty, we are free at last."
The USA has come a long way since 1963. Not only can the Afro-Americans vote anywhere they have many law-makers and even a president - Barack Obama- whose father was a Kenyan Muslim. However, many had to die for this privilege. Malcolm X was gunned down and so was MLK – two of the most motivational black leaders of the yesteryears - in the same 1960s. Dr. King was also very respectful of the role that Malcolm X played in awakening the Blacks in the USA. In a telegram sent to Betty Shabazz after the murder of Malcolm X, Dr. King said, "I always had a deep affection for Malcolm and felt that he had a great ability to put his finger on the existence and the root of the problem. He was an eloquent spokesman for his point of view and no one can honestly doubt that Malcolm had a great concern for the problems we face as a race."
The USA has come a long way since 1963. Not only can the Afro-Americans vote anywhere they have many law-makers and even a president - Barack Obama- whose father was a Kenyan Muslim. However, many had to die for this privilege. Malcolm X was gunned down and so was MLK – two of the most motivational black leaders of the yesteryears - in the same 1960s. Dr. King was also very respectful of the role that Malcolm X played in awakening the Blacks in the USA. In a telegram sent to Betty Shabazz after the murder of Malcolm X, Dr. King said, "I always had a deep affection for Malcolm and felt that he had a great ability to put his finger on the existence and the root of the problem. He was an eloquent spokesman for his point of view and no one can honestly doubt that Malcolm had a great concern for the problems we face as a race."
So, as America
celebrates the 50th anniversary of March on Washington, it would be
wrong to belittle the sacrifice and wisdom of many, while they differed on
methodology and tactics. Malcolm’s views on race relationship are prudent and
he said, “I believe in the brotherhood of man, all men, but I don't believe in
brotherhood with anybody who doesn't want brotherhood with me. I believe in
treating people right, but I'm not going to waste my time trying to treat
somebody right who doesn't know how to return the treatment." [Speech,
Dec. 12 1964, New York City]
This
year the anniversary fell on Wednesday, and the crowd was much smaller in the
capital city. In his address to thousands who gathered on the National Mall to
mark the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington, President Obama paid
tribute to the civil rights leader and to the anonymous millions who stood by
King's side during the civil rights fight of the 1960s. "Because they
marched, America became more free and more fair," Obama said. "Not
just for African Americans but for women and Latinos, Asians and Native
Americans, for Catholics, Jews and Muslims, for gays, for Americans with
disabilities. America changed for you and for me. And the entire world drew
strength from that example." Obama echoed King's "I've been to
the mountaintop" speech when he intoned, "The road ahead will
be long, our climb will be steep." "Their victory was great. But we
would dishonor those heroes as well to suggest that the work of this nation is
somehow complete. The arc of the moral universe may bend towards justice, but
it doesn't bend on its own."
Yes,
the battle for justice and freedom is incomplete even here within the USA.
There are hundreds of Guantanamo Bay prisoners who are wrongfully detained and
are denied freedom. The Rohingya Muslims of Arakan state of Myanmar continue to
be the worst persecuted people on earth and are denied basic human rights in
the land where they have lived since time immemorial. In spite of casual lip
services from the U.S. presidents, the Palestinian people still remain occupied
in the other apartheid state – Israel.
When will
these unfortunate people live as free people like most of us? How serious is
President Obama and how serious are those lawmakers in the Capitol Hill – who
say that they are spiritual children of MLK and yet do just the opposite when
it comes to walking the talk. Hypocrisy, sadly, continues to be the national
obsession at the highest level in this land of the free!
Another ethnic cleansing drive in Myanmar - this time in Sagaing Region
Hardly a week goes without seeing Buddhist violence against unarmed Muslims and other religious minorities in Myanmar. Here is the latest news from the Myanmar News. Hundreds of Muslims were made homeless after about 1000 anti-Muslim rioters rampaged through villages in Sagaing Region’s Kanbalu township on the evening of August 24, setting fire to Muslim-owned properties and attacking rescue vehicles with catapults.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
UN: Rohingya refugees deserve a future beyond survival, not endless displacement
Nine years after the mass displacement of the Rohingya from Myanmar, their situation remains one of the world's most protracted and co...
-
It has become a wallowing cringe. The extolling of multi-culti values, the incessant self-praise of diversity, variety and cosmopolitanis...
-
Click the link: Why Africa has become a hotspot for war | Sudan war | Al Jazeera
-
Flotilla organisers declared a state of emergency on board, expect Israeli interception soon