Thursday, July 30, 2020
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER: POLITICAL PRISONERS IN THE UNITED STATES
Tuesday, July 28, 2020
Rohingya treatment a violation of human rights
The Rohingya Genocide and the ICJ: The Role of the International Community
by Nadira Kourt
July 28, 2020
When it comes to Myanmar, and the plight of its Rohingya people in particular, the international community has consistently failed to adequately respond when faced with serious risks, or even the actual commission of, mass atrocities.
The words “prevention” and “never again” ring hollow when the world’s most powerful, including the United Nations Security Council, did little as a genocide against the Rohingya was unfolding in Myanmar’s Rakhine State. Most governments simply failed to act when action to prevent escalation and respond to atrocities was most needed. The only formal response of the Security Council to the genocide against the Rohingya was the adoption of a November 2017 Presidential Statement – three months after the start of the Myanmar military’s abusive “clearance operations.” Individual governments, meanwhile, were slow to impose sanctions and withdraw support for Myanmar’s military, if they did so at all.
State parties to the Genocide Convention were also silent, even after the U.N. Human Rights Council-mandated Independent International Fact-Finding Mission issued a 2018 report finding “reasonable grounds to conclude” that Myanmar’s military had committed acts of genocide against the Rohingya, along with other atrocity crimes. While many countries privately recognized that the path to state responsibility for the Rohingya genocide was a lawsuit away, the lack of political courage and the prospect of upsetting an important trading partner – China – meant that no nation dared to initiate legal action at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for more than two years since 2017’s escalation of state violence against the Rohingya.
Ultimately, it was the smallest country in mainland Africa – Gambia – that filed a case at the ICJ in November 2019. Gambia accused Myanmar of violating the Genocide Convention and requested the Court to issue provisional measures in order “to protect against further, irreparable harm to the rights of the Rohingya group,” in its application. Two months later, the ICJ ordered Myanmar to prevent genocidal acts generally, to specifically ensure military and police forces do not commit genocidal acts, to preserve all evidence of genocidal acts, and to report back to the court on compliance with these measures.
The first required report was submitted by Myanmar to the ICJ on May 23. The report was not made public and was not shared privately with outside parties, including the Security Council. While the ICJ is not required to share the report, it is at least an option for Security Council members to make such a request – collectively or individually – to the ICJ. Importantly, 13 of the 15 current members of the Security Council are also parties to the Genocide Convention, and therefore have dual obligations to prevent and punish acts of genocide committed against the Rohingya. Examining the first report submitted in May and the subsequent reports due every six months, would allow Council members to monitor compliance with the provisional measures and ensure that Myanmar is doing everything in its power to protect the Rohingya.
The cost of simply waiting for the final judgement is too high. Impunity for atrocities in Myanmar emboldens the military to continue attacks on Rohingya and other minority ethnic groups with no repercussions. In late June, Myanmar’s military once again announced “clearance operations,” a euphemism for a lawless campaign of violence and terror against anyone in the way of crushing an insurgency and an excuse to suppress non-Bamar (the dominant majority ethnic group) populations.
The military’s most recent clearance operations were imposed against the Arakan Army, an armed group primarily associated with the ethnic Rakhine population, but which, in its own words is “compris[ed of] all inhabitants in Arakan [it’s preferred term for Myanmar’s Rakhine state] irrespective of religion, race, ethnicity, minority or majority.” The affected Kyauktan area within Rakhine state is home to an estimated 40,000 people, and includes populations from Rakhine, Rohingya and other ethnic minority communities. The latest operations not only put tens of thousands of civilians from various ethnic groups at risk of atrocities, but potentially defy the provisional measures order issued by the ICJ.
The Commander-in-Chief of the Myanmar Armed Forces, Min Aung Hlaing, had previously said that “the Bengali [a derogatory term for the Rohingya] problem was a long-standing one which has become an unfinished job.” Who is to say the military won’t use the chaos of the new operations to crack down on the remaining Rohingya civilians? Thousands of civilians have already fled amid reports of daily shelling, burning of homes and arrests of villagers.
All parties to the Genocide Convention have international legal obligations to take action to prevent and punish genocide wherever it occurs. They can make legal interventions to promote their interpretation of the Genocide Convention in Gambia vs. Myanmar, provide various forms of assistance to Gambia in litigating the case, or at a minimum, issue public statements of support for the case.
Ultimately, it’s not a purely legal question, it’s a political decision. Will states, and the Security Council in particular, continue their business as usual while Myanmar fails to address its institutionalized discrimination against the Rohingya while terrorizing other ethnic populations? Will the international community allow Myanmar to disenfranchise the Rohingya in the national election set for November 8? How long will the Rohingya have to remain in Bangladesh and risk their lives to flee to other countries in the region without the international community realizing that the root causes of genocide are still in place?
Gambia’s former Minister of Justice, Abubacarr Tambadou, who previously worked as a prosecutor at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, said that what happened to the Rohingya, was “just like Rwanda.” His country spearheaded the case at the ICJ to hold Myanmar responsible and ensure protection for the Rohingya going forward. It is now up to wider international community to make sure that Myanmar’s compliance with the provisional measures translates into tangible changes that improve the lives of the Rohingya in Myanmar and allow for a safe return of refugees to their homeland, where human rights of all people would be respected and protected.
Susan Rice: wrong choice for VP
Biden said he will make his final decision in early August ahead of the Democratic National Convention which will take place in Milwaukee from Aug. 17 to 20.
All the women Biden is considering have had “some exposure to foreign policy and national defense issues,” Biden has said, and he wants someone who can serve as president at a “moment’s notice” and with whom he is “simpatico.”
Rice, whose office was next door to Biden’s during Obama’s second term, checks all those boxes.
“The most important attribute that I have is almost two decades of experience in senior ranks of the executive branch,” Rice told the Washington Post.
While VP contender Sen. Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) has been accused of planting negative stories about potential rivals in the media, Rice has been keeping her name in the news by writing regular op-eds in the New York Times and appearing on a spate of TV shows.
In The New York Times, Rice wrote that Trump “is utterly derelict in his duties, presiding over a dangerously dysfunctional national security process that is putting our country and those who wear its uniform at great risk. At worst, the White House is being run by liars and wimps catering to a tyrannical president who is actively advancing our arch adversary’s nefarious interests.”
On NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rice accused Trump of “doing nothing” about Russian bounties on U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan. On the “Daily Show with Trevor Noah,” she trashed Trump’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Obama administration gave the Trump administration a playbook for a possible pandemic, Rice said, and she personally participated in a tabletop exercise with the incoming Trump cabinet where they discussed the possibility of “a novel SARS-like virus emerging from China,” said Rice.
All that preparation, she said, “seemed to be for naught, because a couple of years into office, President Trump dismantled the office that I set up on global health security; they trashed that playbook or stuck it in some drawer, some shelf and never pulled it out. For two months, January, February and part of March, [Trump] really denied the reality of this virus, equated it to the seasonal flu … and by that time, it was already well-embedded in our country.”
Whether it’s due to her strengths as a potential VP candidate or her criticism, Rice’s reappearance on the national stage earned the Trump administration’s ire, and senior Trump officials have returned fire. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo slammed Rice on Fox News for what he called her “history of going on Sunday shows and lying;” this week, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said Rice had issued a “stand down” order on Russian cyber attacks and did nothing to combat Russian election meddling.
Rice may be about to reprise her role as “the right’s favorite chew toy,” as one commentator dubbed her back in 2012.
Following the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, Rice appeared on the Sunday morning talk shows and recited CIA talking points. Those points, which were based on intelligence assessments at the time, turned out to be incomplete and misleading, and Rice was accused of being “incompetent,” “untrustworthy,” and soft-pedaling terrorism. She has also been criticized for her decision to unmask the identities of senior Trump officials, which President Trump called a crime.
Rice, who was Obama’s national security advisor at the time, told House investigators that she asked for the unmasking in order to understand why the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates was in New York late in 2016. Her explanation satisfied influential Republicans on the House committee that investigated.
“I didn’t hear anything to believe that she did anything illegal,” Florida Republican Rep. Tom Rooney told CNN of Rice’s testimony, which is classified.
Although it was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, not Rice, who played the lead role in the decisions that led to the Benghazi attacks, Rice has been widely panned in conservative media as responsible for the embassy attack. A Biden selection would give Republicans an opportunity to resurrect Rice as their bogey-woman. But with Democrat voters, there’s a possibility those attacks could backfire, and the left could spin them as Fox News baselessly attacking a blameless black woman.
Whether Rice is chosen as Biden’s vice presidential pick or not, she will likely have a great deal of influence within a Biden administration, particularly on foreign policy. She had a seat at the table during some of the Obama administration’s most momentous decisions. She was Obama’s ambassador to the UN during his first term; during his second, she served as national security adviser. What, if any, lessons did she learn?
What would U.S. foreign policy look like with Biden and Rice working in the West Wing again?
“Even if she is not chosen as Biden’s VP, Rice would be in line for Secretary of State, or another position of that elevated nature. I’m aghast at the thought of her becoming president, because she’s such a hawk,” said historian and investigative journalist Gareth Porter, in an interview with The American Conservative. Porter pointed to Rice’s influence on the Obama administration decision to bomb Libya and Syria, as well as her push for escalation in Afghanistan and her support of aid to the Syrian rebels. “In each case I would argue she was coming out either against Obama’s clear-cut instincts or preferences in White House meetings or in a situation where he was hesitant,” and that she was part of the pressure he received from “a coalition of hawks” in the administration.
Obama ultimately overruled Rice on Syria, a decision that she says was the right call.
Here’s how she describes it:
“Ultimately, we would fail to garner the necessary support for a congressional authorization to use force. Republicans and Democrats had acted precisely as I predicted. Ironically, it turns out, I was right about the politics; but President Obama was right about the policy. Without the use of force, we ultimately achieved a better outcome than I had imagined.”
It is difficult to imagine a situation worse than Syria, where nearly half a million have died in a civil war that has been ongoing since 2011.
This incident is illustrative; has Rice learned from her mistakes?
Her nearly 500 page memoir Tough Love: My Story of the Things Worth Fighting For, published in 2019, meticulously documents a great deal. Rice is careful to thank nearly everyone she ever worked with, including the White House chef!
Unfortunately, she studiously avoids drawing overarching policy conclusions. Rice, a Stanford graduate and Rhodes scholar with a Ph.D. in international relations, is simply too smart to jeopardize her future Washington career ambitions by offending or criticizing anyone she might have to work with again. Her book is, therefore, a typical one by someone hoping for a position in a future president’s administration.
“Susan Rice is right in the middle of the road, when you think about foreign policy hands in DC,” said John Glaser, director of foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, in an interview with The American Conservative. “She has a lot of high level experience in foreign policy, but I’ve never been able to detect a way she stands out as a unique thinker, in that she had something to say about the way she’d prefer the U.S. to go. She says things that are plastic, packaged to be right in the center of the foreign policy consensus in D.C. That’s how I see her: run of the mill, not an extraordinary pick … If she were VP, our foreign policy would not be different than what we’ve seen the past 30 years.”
Given that Biden is campaigning on a “return to normalcy,” the foreign policy of the last 30 years isn’t necessarily something that Biden views negatively.
A Biden-Rice presidency would seek a return to the Paris climate accords, the JCPOA Iran deal negotiated during Obama’s second term, and would expand and strengthen NATO. They would likely avoid engaging in any new ground wars like Libya or Syria. Biden and Rice would be more hawkish on Russia, and if Rice’s latest op-eds are any measure, they would likely be more assertive with China as well.
“But, I worry that at the end of a Biden administration, we will still be arguing about getting out of Afghanistan, and (about) stopping the bombing of places like Iraq,” Glaser said.
Najib Guilty Of Multi-Billion-Dollar Scandal
The former prime minister could now face decades in jail after being convicted on all charges in the case related to the looting of sovereign wealth fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad.Malaysia's ex-leader Najib Razak
Malaysia's ex-leader Najib Razak was found guilty today - Tuesday in his first trial over the multi-billion-dollar 1MDB scandal, two years after the fraud contributed to the downfall of his long-ruling government.
The former prime minister could now face decades in jail after being convicted on all charges in the case related to the looting of sovereign wealth fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad.
Billions of dollars were stolen from the investment vehicle and spent on everything from high-end real estate to pricey art, while investment bank Goldman Sachs also became embroiled in the scandal.
Anger at the looting played a large part in the shock loss of Najib's long-ruling coalition in elections in 2018, and he was arrested and hit with dozens of charges following his defeat.
The verdict was a test of Malaysia's rule of law. It comes about five months after Najib's scandal-plagued party returned to power as part of a coalition, a development observer had feared could affect the outcome of the case.
About 16 months after it began, the Kuala Lumpur High Court delivered the verdict in Najib's first trial, which centered on the transfer of 42 million ringgit ($9.9 million) from a former 1MDB unit, SRC International, into his accounts.
Najib had vehemently denied wrongdoing.
But Judge Mohamad Nazlan Mohamad Ghazali took apart all the arguments put forward by his defense, and found him guilty on the seven charges he faced.
"In conclusion, after considering all the evidence in this trial, I find the prosecution has successfully proven the case," the judge told the court.
Abuse of Power
The charges were one of abuse of power, three of criminal breach of trust, and three of money-laundering.
The counts of abuse of power and criminal breach of trust are punishable by up to 20 years in jail each, while the money-laundering charges are punishable by up to 15 years each.
Sentencing was not handed down straight away. The 67-year-old will likely appeal and he may not be sent to jail immediately. If his conviction is upheld, he will also be barred from political office for several years.
Najib had insisted he was ignorant of the transactions.
The defense team portrayed Najib as a victim and instead sought to paint financier Low Taek Jho, a key figure in the scandal who has been charged in the US and Malaysia, as the mastermind.
Low, whose whereabouts are unknown, maintains his innocence.
Prosecutors insisted Najib was in control of the 1MDB unit, SRC International.
The return of Najib's party to power as part of a coalition in March followed the collapse of Mahathir Mohamad's reformist administration.
Since then, 1MDB-linked charges were unexpectedly dropped against the ex-leader's stepson Riza Aziz, a producer of Hollywood movie "The Wolf of Wall Street", in exchange for him agreeing to return assets to Malaysia.
Prosecutors also dropped dozens of charges against Najib ally Musa Aman, the former leader of Sabah state.
The amounts involved in Najib's first case are small compared to those in his second and most significant trial, which centers on allegations he illicitly obtained more than $500 million.
Malaysia had charged Goldman Sachs and some current and former staff, claiming large amounts were stolen when the bank arranged bond issues for 1MDB.
But the two sides agreed to a $3.9 billion settlement last week in exchange for charges being dropped.
Monday, July 27, 2020
Hajj Stories about the pious Muslims
By Habib Siddiqui
Earlier this month the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia declared that this year hajj – the annual pilgrimage to Ka’bah in Makkah – would be scaled down allowing only a thousand of local Saudis to observe it. No overseas Muslims, which accounted for a majority of some three million pilgrims in a regular year – would be allowed to perform hajj this year. The Saudi decision was taken to preserve global public health in the absence of any vaccine to fight Covid-19.
The hajj event will start on July 29, corresponding to the 8th day of Islamic calendar Dhul-Hijjah.
It is the first time in the Saudi kingdom's nearly 90-year history that foreign Muslims have been barred from performing Hajj. No one over the age of 65 or with chronic illnesses would be allowed to perform Hajj. Pilgrims will be tested for the new coronavirus before arriving in the holy city of Makkah and will be required to quarantine at home after the ritual ends.
Wearing face masks at all times will be mandatory for pilgrims and organizers. Touching or kissing the Ka’bah, the holiest site in Islam, will be banned during Hajj this year, and a physical distancing space of 1.5 meters (five feet) between each pilgrim during the rituals - including congregational prayers and while inside the Ka’bah tawaf (circling) area - will be imposed. The access to holy sites at Mina, Muzdalifah, and Mount Arafat will only be limited to those with Hajj permits until August 2.
As I have noted in an earlier article, Hajj has been cancelled in the past because of war and past epidemics throughout history. Ken Chitwood, Lecturer, Concordia College, New York has a good article citing such occasions when hajj could not be held.
So while the ban on foreign Muslims who had intended to perform Hajj this year is disappointing they should be reminded of the Prophetic hadith that provides guidance about traveling during a time of an epidemic: “If you hear of an outbreak of plague in a land, do not enter it; but if the plague breaks out in a place while you are in it, do not leave that place.”
In Islam, intention counts and who knows Allah (SWT) may accept their intention even though they cannot or couldn’t perform the hajj this year.
In this regard, I like to share the well-known story related by Imam Abdullah ibn al-Mubarak (r: Rahmatullah Alayh) who was one of the illustrious followers of the great Imam Abu Hanifa (r). Abdullah ibn Mubarak was born in 118 A.H. of a Turkish father and a Persian mother. He was a noted authority on Prophetic Traditions and a famous ascetic. In alternate years he would perform hajj, and go out for Jihad, and a third year he would engage in commerce. He would divide the profits of this trading among his followers. He distributed much of his wealth in alms to the poor.
When Abdullah ibn al-Mubarak (R) was living in the holy city of Makkah, one year, having completed the rites of pilgrimage, he fell asleep. In a dream he saw two angels descend from heaven.
“How many have come this year?” one asked the other.
“Six hundred thousand,” the other replied.
“How many have had their pilgrimage accepted?”
“Not one,” said the angel. “However, there is a cobbler in Damascus called Ali ibn Muaffaq. He has not come on the pilgrimage, but his pilgrimage is accepted and all his sins have been forgiven.”
When Abdullah (r) heard this, he was filled with sadness: all these people who had come from far distant ends of this earth, traversing wide deserts, all their labor was in vain. He decided to go to Damascus and visit that person. After he went there, he found Ali the cobbler, and told him of the dream. Hearing this, the cobbler uttered a cry and fell unconscious. When he recovered, Abdullah inquired, “Tell me your story.”
The man told, “For thirty years now I have longed to make the pilgrimage to Makkah. I had saved up 350 dirhams from my cobbling. This year I had resolved to go to Makkah. One day my pregnant lady smelt the smell of food coming from our neighbor and asked me to get some food from there. I went and knocked on the neighbor’s door and explained the situation. My neighbor burst into tears. She said, ‘My children have eaten nothing for three days. Today I saw a donkey lying dead, so I hacked off a piece and cooked it. It would not be lawful food for you.’ My heart burned within me when I heard her tale. I took out the 350 dirhams and gave them to her saying, ‘Spend these on the children. This is my pilgrimage.’”
“The angel spoke truly in my dream,” Abdullah declared, “and the Heavenly King was true in His judgment.” [Tadhkirat al-Auliyah]
Niyah or intention is important in Islam. The above story highlights that one’s hajj may be accepted by Allah (SWT) for meritorious deeds like feeding of the poor and the needy.
The second story I want to share is about Abu Bakr al-Kattani (r), a native of Baghdad. He was a disciple of Junayd al-Baghdadi (r). He was called the Lamp of Sanctuary, because he later settled in Makkah. He lived there for nearly 30 years until his death in 322 AH (934 CE). He used to pray all night at the Ka’bah completing the recitation of the Qur’an every night.
At the beginning of his spiritual journey, he sought permission from his mother to go on the hajj (pilgrimage).
“When I was proceeding into the desert,” he recalled, “a state overtook me compelling me to wash for self-purification. I told myself perhaps I had not set out under the proper auspices; so I turned back. I reached home to find my mother seated behind the door of the house, waiting for me. ‘Mother,’ I said, ‘did you not give me permission?’ ‘Yes,’ my mother replied, ‘but without you I could not bear to look at the house. Since you departed I have been seated here. I resolved that I would not rise up until you come back again.’”
It was not until his mother died that Al-Kattani (r) ventured into the desert once more to complete his hajj. [Tadhkirat al-Auliyah]
The story above highlights the importance of caring for one’s parents. In a famous hadith, a man came to the Prophet Muhammad (S: sallal-lahu alayhi wa sallam) and said, O Messenger of Allah, how do I enter Jannah (paradise)? The Prophet (S) asked, “Is your mother alive?” The man said, “Yes, she is alive.” The Prophet (S) said, “Find her feet and stick yourself to them (which is an Arabic expression, meaning “to lower and humble yourself to service your mother”); there you will find Jannah.”
Abu Hurairah (RA) narrated that once the Prophet (S) said: “Let him be humbled, let him be humbled, let him be humbled.” His companions were perplexed, and they asked: “Allah’s Messenger, who is he?” He (S) replied, “He who finds his parents in old age, either one or both of them, but did not use their presence (by doing good to them, etc.) to cause him to enter Paradise.” [Muslim]
The third story I want to share is that of Bishr al-Hafi (r), the barefooted one. He was born in Merv around 767 CE and settled in Baghdad. In his early years, he lived a life of dissipation but later he repented and became one of the great ascetics of Islam.
A man once came to seek advice from Bishr al-Hafi (r).
“I have 2000 dirhams lawfully acquired. I wish to go on the pilgrimage.”
“You want to walk for your own amusement,” Bishr (r) replied. “If you are really intent on pleasing Allah, then go and pay someone’s debt, or give the money to an orphan, or someone in poor circumstances. The ease thus given to a Muslim’s heart is more acceptable to Allah than a hundred hajj.”
“I put prior the desire to make the pilgrimage,” the man said.
“That is because you have obtained these moneys by means that are not good,” Bishr commented. “You will never find rest until you have spent them in improper ways.”
[Tadhkirat al-Auliya]
The fourth story I want to share is about the importance of doing good to others (similar to the theme of the previous story) and meeting the basic needs of others instead of busying oneself with prayer alone during the hajj.
A pilgrim had returned from Hajj. He was relating his adventures to Imam Jafar al-Sadiq (r) – a great scholar of Islam and a contemporary of Imam Abu Hanifa (r) - and his companion. He was most impressed with one of his companions of Hajj, and was praising him: “What a pious man, we were so blessed to have him with us, he was busy praying and worshiping all the time. As we would stop somewhere, he would rush to a corner and start prayers.”
Imam Jafar (r): “Then who was attending to his duties? Who was watering and feeding his animal (ride)?”
Man: “Of course, we had the honor of doing all that for him. He was busy in his sacred quest, and had nothing to do with such mundane things.”
Imam Jafar (r): “Then indeed, you all are better than him.”
[Anecdotes of Pious Ones]
The last story I want to share is the celebrated story from Shaykh Abu’l-Qasim al-Junayd (r) who was a great teacher. He (r) asked a pilgrim who had returned from Makkah, “Since the first moment that you started your journey from home, have you been journeying away from sins as well?” The pilgrim replied “No.”
Junayd (r) continued, “In that case you have not accomplished any journey... Did you cover and distance between God, as you stopped from place to place on your way?” The pilgrim replied, “No.”
Junayd (r) said, “In that case you have not covered the path from stag to stage... When at the required place, you donned the pilgrim’s robe, did you throw away the qualities of human nature just as you had thrown away your clothes?” The pilgrim replied, “No.”
Junayd (r) said, “In that case you were not clothed in the robe of a pilgrim... When you stood at Arafat, were you even for a while lost in meditation about God?” The pilgrim replied, “No.”
Junayd (r) said, “In that case you were not standing at Arafat... When you were at Muzdalifa and your wish was fulfilled, did you completely give up all your worldly wishes?” The pilgrim replied, “No.”
Junayd (r) said, “In that case you have not gone to Muzdalifa... When you went round the Ka’bah, did you see the vision of God in that house of purification?” The pilgrim replied, “No.”
Junayd (r) said, “In that case you have not gone round the Ka’bah... When you ran between Safa and Marwa, did you feel purified?” The pilgrim replied, “No.”
Junayd (r) said, “In that case you did not perform the ceremony of running... When you arrived at Mina, did you feel that all your desires had been ended?” The pilgrim replied, “No.”
Junayd (r) said, “In that case you did not visit Mina... When you reached the place where sacrifices are offered, did you slaughter your worldly wishes?” The pilgrim replied, “No.”
Junayd (r) said, “In that case you offered no sacrifice... When you threw pebbles, did you also discard all worldly desires that were within you?” The pilgrim replied, “No.”
Junayd (r) said, “In that case you threw no pebbles... The pilgrimage has not yet been accomplished by you.”
[Kashf al-Mahjub]
[For many such devotional stories, the interested readers may like to read the author’s book – Devotional Stories, pub. A. S. Noordeen, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2011).]
May Allah guide us all to be better Muslims in this time of fitnah (trial and tribulation) and fasad (corruption and depravity).
The Hidden Toll of Local Revenue: How Bangladesh’s District Administration Is Forced Into Corruption
By Habib Siddiqui (Based on information shared by senior public servants who requested anonymity) Bangladesh’s citizens often imagine the...
-
Click the link: Why Africa has become a hotspot for war | Sudan war | Al Jazeera
-
Flotilla organisers declared a state of emergency on board, expect Israeli interception soon
-
Subject: Rebuilding the temple VID-20260405-WA0009 .mp4 14.3 MB