Monday, August 31, 2020

Reverse Decision to Bar Rohingya from Elections - Fortify Rights Demands

(YANGON, August 31, 2020)—The Government of Myanmar should take immediate steps to ensure that ethnic-Rohingya can run for seats in Parliament in the November 8 elections, said Fortify Rights today. The Union Election Commission announced the final list of candidates over the weekend, excluding the majority of Rohingya applicants.

"This election is increasingly on track to being unfree, but there is still time to change course,” said Ismail Wolff, Fortify Rights Regional Director. “For an inclusive, free, and fair election, the government must ensure everyone’s right to meaningfully participate, regardless of their race, religion, or ethnicity. That hasn’t happened yet."
Between August 11 and 24, the commission twice rejected the candidacies of at least six Rohingya, refusing their registrations and appeals. The six rejected Rohingya candidates include one woman—Khin Khin Lwin, 43—and Kyaw Min, 76, Aung Hla, 58, Saw Myint, 66, Abdul Rasheed, 58, and Abu Tahay, 56.
 
The continued denial of Rohingya candidates’ right to stand for election is part of the Myanmar Government’s wider persecution of the ethnic minority and refusal of their full citizenship rights, said Fortify Rights. The previous government, under former President Thein Sein, disenfranchised Rohingya from the 2015 polls but they were able to run and vote in earlier elections.
 
Several governments and international organizations are believed to be providing financial and technical assistance for Myanmar’s forthcoming elections, risking complicity by failing to mount concerted efforts to prevent the political disenfranchisement of Rohingya.
"Knowing a violation is happening, having the ability to influence it, and doing nothing is the very definition of complicity,” said Ismail Wolff. “This isn’t a question of sovereignty or rule of law: it’s a question of ending genocide and recognizing dignity and rights for all.”

For more information, please contact:


Ismail Wolff, Regional Director, Fortify Rights
+66 81 643 0009, (Thailand)
Email: Ismail.Wolff@fortifyrights.org
Twitter: @ismailwolff@FortifyRights

Nickey Diamond, Myanmar Human Rights Specialist, Fortify Rights
+95 0 99 7568 3114 (Myanmar) (Burmese; English)
Email: Nickey.Diamond@FortifyRights.org
Twitter: @NickeyMdy@FortifyRights

John Quinley III, Senior Human Rights Specialist, Fortify Rights
+66 62 814 1130 (Thailand; WhatsApp)
Email: John.Quinley@FortifyRights.org
Twitter: @john_hq3, @FortifyRights

 

Can more laws save Bangladesh from becoming a corrupt state?

By using shell companies and moving money from one account to another, Prashanta Kumar Halder laundered at least Tk 3,500 crore out of the country and is now enjoying his life in Canada. In his tracks, PK Halder left four non-banking financial institutions (NBFI) in ruin, and in case you were wondering why he chose four NBFIs instead of banks, the answer could be because many of our banks’ vaults may very well be empty already.

After all, as this newspaper reported on August 16, financial regulators and government organisations are still struggling to recover Tk 18,253 crore that were embezzled in five of the more spectacular financial scams involving the country’s banks. Even that aside, the financial sector is reeling from huge defaulted loans.

As the report also mentioned, the prime suspects in some of those cases were not even the main accused in the lawsuits due to them being connected with influential quarters. So can you really blame PK Halder? If all those crooks got their share, I bet Halder must have thought, “why not me”? “I’m a crook too.” This is what happens when you sit idly by while delinquents rob the public exchequer.

On January 8 this year, the Anti-Corruption Commission filed a case against Halder for amassing property worth around Tk 274.91 crore from unknown sources. Upon digging deeper—a bit too little too late, mind you—the Anti-Corruption Commission unearthed that Halder’s shell companies had borrowed massive sums of money from the NBFIs without collateral, “perhaps” because he owned shares in those NBFIs.

This, too, is an old story. It was similar corruption that had previously led to another NBFI—First Finance—being unable to maintain its mandatory cash reserve with the central bank. As well as the corruption that nearly sank the Farmers Bank (“Banking Sector: A house of cards”, The Daily Star, December 27, 2017). Yet, our banks, NBFIs, and the regulators seem not to have learned any lessons, which gives the impression that either they are extremely slow learners (very unlikely) or simply don’t want to learn (more likely).

Halder could not have committed the crimes all on his own, neither could he have perpetrated them with just one or two accomplices. Clearly others were involved in them—we are talking about Tk 274.91 crore after all. In this connection, the ACC has summoned multiple people for questioning. Let’s hope that this time they catch the perpetrators before they launder all the money and themselves, out of the country.

Undoubtedly there is something wrong in our system which is letting such huge amounts of money to be siphoned out of the country. For example, it was the ACC’s blunder which allowed Motazzaroul Islam Mithu, who has several medical equipment supplying companies including Lexicon Merchandize and Meditech Imaging Ltd, to take over control of tenders in the health sector. In 2013, serious anomalies in the health sector led the ACC to ask Mithu to submit a wealth statement following the allegation that he had amassed wealth of about Tk 50 crore beyond the known source of income. But he did not bother to respond to the notice.

Later on, his syndicate looted about Tk 450 crore without supplying any medical equipment to the Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College and Hospital, according to a letter issued to the public administration ministry on May 30. According to a US-based real estate information providing online service, in 2014 Mithu bought a villa in New York spending Tk 6.6 crore (USD 847,500). Had the ACC been more proactive, it is possible that Mithu could have been exposed long ago. However, given the ACC’s lethargy, Mithu managed to continue amassing wealth and in 2016, his name surfaced in the Panama and Paradise Papers leaks—and it is quite likely that he has laundered huge sums of money out of the country.

A Global Financial Integrity report ranks Bangladesh as one of the top countries facing trade-based money laundering (TBML), which is a significant threat to growth and sustainable development. It estimates that some USD 3.1 billion, or Tk 26,400 crore, is being illegally remitted from Bangladesh a year. To address this, the government is expected to tighten tax rules soon—and taxpayers who inflate values of goods when declaring investments in their tax returns will have to face a hefty fine. But will that be enough? What about those who are defrauding banks and NBFIs—and particularly those with “political connections”—and laundering the money they have hollowed out of them?

The problem is not only a shortage of regulation, but a lack of their proper application, equally for all. As Tacitus, the famous Roman historian and politician said, “the more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws”. And Bangladesh seems to have become a prime example of what he was referring to.

As long as the authorities turn a blind eye to “some” because of their “political connection”, many more who are perhaps not as well connected—and therefore have to flee to some foreign country after robbing banks, NBFIs or other institutions, instead of taking over banks or public offices in the country—will continue to follow in their footsteps. In the meanwhile, huge sums of taxpayers’ money will continue to get drained from the economy, causing enormous damage to Bangladesh.

Moreover, it is not only the perpetrators of these crimes that must be held accountable, but the regulators who “fail to notice them on time” and either stop them or apprehend the criminals, who must also be punished. Along with those “connected” individuals who try to influence the regulators—as it is mainly this practice that has made our regulatory bodies toothless.


Sunday, August 30, 2020

Modi’s ‘settler’ masterplan for Indian Kashmir


Inline image1/4 :Indian policemen detain a Kashmiri Shiite Muslims as he and others attempt to take out a religious procession in Srinagar, Indian-controlled Kashmir, on Aug. 28, 2020. (AP Photo/Mukhtar Khan)Inline image
2/4 :A Kashmiri Shiite Muslim man is detained by Indian police as devotees defy restrictions for a Muharram procession in Srinagar on August 28, 2020. (AFP / Tauseef Mustafa)Inline image
3/4 A Kashmiri Shiite Muslim is detained by Indian police for defying restrictions for a Muharram procession in Srinagar on August 28, 2020. (AFP / Tauseef Mustafa)Inline image
4/4 Indian policemen detain Kashmiri Shiite Muslims as they attempt to take out a religious procession in Srinagar, Indian-controlled Kashmir, on Aug. 28, 2020. (AP Photo/Mukhtar Khan)

Updated 29 August 2020
AFP
SRINAGAR, India: Prime Minister Narendra Modi is changing Indian Kashmir’s residency laws for the first time since 1947, in a bid to snuff out any challenge to the disputed territory belonging to India.

Drawing comparisons with Israel’s “settler” tactics in the Palestinian Territories, Modi’s Hindu nationalist government aims to change the demographic makeup and identity of the Muslim-majority region, critics say.

AFP looks at the background, what the new rules are and their implications for the area’s 14 million population.

Siege-like curfew

The Himalayan former princely state has been split between India and Pakistan since independence from Britain in 1947

In the Indian-administered part a conflict between separatist rebels and government forces has killed tens of thousands since 1989, mostly civilians.

More than 65 percent of the population is Muslim. In the Kashmir Valley, the main center of the rebellion, it is close to 100 percent.

On August 5, 2019 Modi’s government revoked articles in the Indian constitution that guaranteed Kashmir’s partial autonomy and other rights including its own flag and constitution.

A huge accompanying security operation saw tens of thousands of extra troops — adding to 500,000 already there — enforce a siege-like curfew. Thousands were arrested and telecommunications were cut for months.

Jammu & Kashmir state was demoted to a union territory governed directly from New Delhi, while the Ladakh region was carved out into a separate administrative area.

Creating such new “facts on the ground” in Kashmir has long been advocated by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the hard-line Hindu parent organization to Modi’s BJP party.

The move sent a further shudder through India’s 200-million Muslim minority and defenders of its secular traditions, who fear Modi wants to create a Hindu nation — something he denies.

“What I see unfolding is a Hindu settler colonial project in the making,” Mona Bhan, associate professor of anthropology at Syracuse University who has long researched Kashmir, told AFP.

'Demographic flooding'

Modi’s government tore up Kashmir’s special residence rules dating back to 1927 which had ensured only permanent residents could own land and property, secure government jobs and university places and vote in local elections.

Now a raft of different categories of people from anywhere in India can apply for domicile certificates, giving them access to all the above.

These include those living in Kashmir for 15 years, who include around 28,000 refugees who fled Pakistan and as many as 1.75 million migrant laborers — most of whom are Hindus.

In addition, civil servants who have worked in Kashmir for seven years and their children, or students who have taken certain exams, also qualify for domicile status.
The changes are “the most drastic imposed since 1947,” Siddiq Wahid, a historian and political analyst, told AFP. “It was done with the intent to open the gates to demographic flooding.”

Domicile certificates

Locals too now have to apply for the new “domicile certificates” in order to qualify for permanent resident rights.

To get this, they have to produce their Permanent Resident Certificates (PRC), cherished documents valid since 1927, which then become worthless.

Speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity, an engineering graduate said young Kashmiris were in effect being forced to give their political loyalty to India in exchange for a livelihood.

“They say, you want a job, OK, get the domicile document first,” he said.

A few people. Bahadur Lal Prajapati, born in Indian Kashmir to Hindu refugees who fled Pakistan during its first war with India over Kashmir seven decades ago, is finally an official resident and has “never been so happy.”

“We got the right to live in this part of India as citizens after 72 years of struggle,” Prajapati, 55, told AFP from his home in Jammu, the Hindu-dominated district of the region.

One of the first people to receive the new domicile certificate was Navin Kumar Choudhary, a top bureaucrat from the Indian state of Bihar who worked in Kashmir for many years.

Photos on social media of Choudhary proudly holding the certificate sparked huge anger among Kashmiris but delight among Modi’s supporters.

'Travesty'

Some 430,000 new domicile certificates have been issued — despite the coronavirus pandemic. It is unclear how many of them are to people from outside and how many to locals.

Many locals are refusing to swap their old documents, even though this makes life harder. Some do it in secret for fear of censure from their neighbors.

Wary of being labelled “anti-national” by the authorities many Kashmiris are also scared to speak out openly. Some are deleting their Twitter accounts.

“It’s a travesty that I have to compete with outsiders for citizenship rights in my own homeland,” said a student — who also wished also to remain anonymous out of fear of problems with the authorities.

China’s 260 concentration camps are proof of pure evil

china muslims concentration camps

Buildings at the Artux City Vocational Skills Education Training Service Center, believed to be a Chinese re-education camp. GREG BAKER/AFP via Getty Images

It turns out the Chinese Communist Party is bent on permanently locking up much of the Uighur Muslim population of the far-west region of Xinjiang: Satellite images show that Beijing has secretly built 260 high-security concentration camps to hold them.

Many, perhaps all, include a factory in the camp so the prisoners can be forced to labor for the state, as well.

The world has known for years that China is detaining roughly 1 million ethnic Uighurs and other Turkic minorities. But now BuzzFeed News has used satellite analysis to uncover the full apparatus of eternal repression.

Beijing insists most of the detainees are already free, but this reporting shows they’ve simply been moved from initial holding facilities in schools and other public buildings to the new prisons — where the torture, forced birth control and brainwashing sessions will continue.

BuzzFeed’s analysts spotted at least one detention center in every county in Xinjiang, built as fast as under six months. (Ninety-two of the 260 sites have been clearly confirmed as detention centers; 176 facilities have been identified only by satellite imagery.)

“People are living in horror in these ­places,” said Zhenishan Berdibek, 49, who was held in a camp for much of 2018. “Some of the younger people were not as tolerant as us — they cried and screamed and shouted.” “I lost my hope,” Berdibek told BuzzFeed. “I wanted to die inside the camp.”

Beijing has claimed that the Uighurs represent an Islamic terrorist threat, but the ugly reality is the CCP under President Xi Jinping is bent on crushing any possible resistance or dissent, religious or secular — and laughs at the idea of human rights.



Saturday, August 29, 2020

Trump’s acceptance speech at the RNC epitomized scare tactics By Habib Siddiqui

 

On Thursday night (August 27, 2020) President Donald Trump of the United States delivered his acceptance speech as the presidential candidate at the Republican National Convention (RNC) that was held in the White House. It was the first of its kind when the White House was used as a podium for campaign by a seating president. As noted by presidential historians, the decision to use the White House as a backdrop is a perfect metaphor for how Trump has handled the presidency: With total audacity -- and no regard for how his actions will change the lines of acceptable conduct for whoever follows him in the office. He treated the White House as his personal property.

More than 1,500 people were in the audience, packed cheek to jaw with very few putting a mask, on the South Lawn of the White House to hear Trump's speech. Unlike the Democratic convention a week earlier that was held virtually, Trump wanted a big crowd whether or not coronavirus was still rampant in the country, and he got that crowd size.

However, if Trump was looking for a better Nielsen rating, it was disappointing. His primetime speech drew a rating of 14.1, which means 14.1 percent of homes in more than 50 major markets around the country tuned in. The Democratic Party candidate Joe Biden, by contrast, drew a 17.5 rating for his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. In terms of viewers, an estimated 24.6 million watched Biden’s acceptance speech across 12 networks, which was 22 minutes long, compared with the 23.8 million who watched Trump’s 70-minute RNC address across 13 different networks (one more than Biden’s).

Opening night numbers showed a wider gap, with 17 million viewers for the RNC's first evening on Monday, compared to 19.7 million viewers for the DNC on Aug. 17; Wednesday night saw 17.3 million viewers for the RNC compared to 22.8 million who watched Aug. 19, when Kamala Harris accepted the vice-presidential nomination. The only night the GOP drew better than the Democrats was on the convention's second evening, Tuesday, which featured a speech from First Lady Melania Trump. The RNC drew 19.4 viewers over 11 networks, compared to the Democrats' 19.2 million viewers on Aug. 18.

Trump’s speech was preceded by his eldest daughter’s speech. Ivanka presented her father as a person who speaks his mind: "I recognize that my dad's communication style is not to everyone's taste. And I know his tweets can feel a bit unfiltered. But the results speak for themselves."

Knowing that he is behind his rival in approval rating by double digits, Trump and his supporting cast did not waste any time with the scare tactics: i.e., what could go wrong if the ‘socialist’ and ‘police-defunding’ Joe Biden and his ‘unpatriotic’ and ‘crazy’ democrats were to get elected and run this ‘great’ country. The message was loud and clear: you may not like what Trump says and even some of the things he does, but the alternative is your worst nightmare – unending chaos and the collapse of democracy with hoodlums and rioters running the country. "No one will be safe in Biden's America." "Your vote will decide whether we protect law-abiding Americans, or whether we give free reign to violent anarchists, agitators, and criminals who threaten our citizens," Trump said in his acceptance speech.

Why the scare tactics? The answer is simple and a prudent one. Fear tactics work (thus, continue to be exploited in post-Hitler-Mussolini era by neo-fascist leaders like Narendra Modi in India, Suu Kyi and the Tatmadaw military establishment in Myanmar and Viktor Orban in Hungary) and is known to be a hugely powerful motivator when it comes to voting. And Trump and his team knows he isn't winning this presidential race, unless, of course, his base is catalyzed to action and the undecided voters are mobilized to vote in large numbers in his favor.

Part of the Trump campaign’s reelection strategy has been to try to make this a choice election rather than a referendum on how Trump has handled the coronavirus pandemic, the biggest test to his presidency. It’s also a brilliant ploy - to deflect the public opinion or inquiry into his own performance, e.g., when he claimed half a year ago that “when we get into April, in the warmer weather—that has a very negative effect on that, and that type of a virus.” He has proven himself to be either a moron or totally ill-prepared to tackle the pandemic. His arrogance, combined with sheer stupidity or failure to take timely preventive measures has resulted in the deaths of nearly two hundred thousand Americans, let alone the infection of so many.

As to his own achievement, Trump did not fail to mention the economic ‘miracle’ he had delivered before the Covid-19 hit hard. It’s true that before the coronavirus pandemic struck, the U.S. unemployment rate was just 3.5% — as low as it had been in half a century and that the U.S. economy added 6.8 million jobs in 37 months. But economic growth fell short of what he promised. Moreover, in the 37 months before Trump took office, the U.S. economy added 8.2 million jobs, surpassing Trump’s record.

The economy grew 2.2% last year, roughly on par with the pace over the past decade. Growth briefly hit Trump’s 3% target in 2018, following passage of the Republican tax cut. However, it was short-lived with sagging global demand as well as uncertainty stemming from the president’s trade war with not only China but with more friendly nations like Canada and those within the European Union.

With high unemployment rate, the economy is in dire condition now. Trump claimed, “Over the past three months, we have gained over 9 million jobs, and that’s a record in the history of our country.” The fact is while U.S. employers added more than 9 million jobs in May, June and July, Trump and his administration has nothing to take credit for the job numbers.  More importantly, that’s fewer than half the 22 million jobs that were lost in March and April as the economy slid into the deepest recession since the Great Depression. What’s more, job gains slowed last month. And at 10.2%, the unemployment rate is still higher than at any time during the Great Recession more than a decade ago. On Thursday, the Labor Department reported that more than a million people filed new claims for unemployment benefits last week. Twenty-seven million people were collecting unemployment as of early August.

President Trump’s battle cry against the S-word – socialism is one that has been repeated throughout the RNC, from his campaign advisers to former Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley. In fact, the S-word has been leveled against Democrats for decades. But as noted by many analysts, Democrats’ propensity to lean toward regulation and empowering the federal government isn’t actually a socialist political system, where the state uniformly provides social welfare services like health care and controls large sections of the economy.

Trump tried to present himself as the law-and-order restoring president and the theme was not lost in his acceptance speech by trying to draw a contrast with Democrats. Quite a few Black Americans were brought to the podium to share their anecdotes, which belie the reality experienced by most Blacks in this land of Lincoln where they are more prone to be killed for minor crimes in the hands of the police simply because of their skin color. Trump’s racially charging and religiously maligning tweets and speeches have sent a wrong message polarizing the communities as never before in this century. During his tenure, religious bigotry and racial injustice have simply compounded multifold. But such ground realities did not stop him to falsely claim that he has done more for the African-American community than any president since Abraham Lincoln, our first Republican president.”

White evangelicals and other conservative Christians have remained, by and large, a bastion of support for President Trump, and his speech didn’t disappoint them. He presented himself as an upholder of the Christian faith and a protector of its faithful. He said, Unlike many presidents before me, I kept my promise, recognized Israel’s true capital and moved our embassy to Jerusalem.” He said, “I withdrew from the terrible one-sided Iran nuclear deal.” He also said, We also recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.”

It is worth noting that Trump recently said publicly that he moved the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem “for the evangelicals,” who express strong support for Israel. The embassy move was met with support from many Jewish and evangelical groups but was criticized by some religious leaders. All these actions, appeasing the Zionist state of Israel, are illegal under international law and have weakened American position internationally. But to Trump such supports from the international community never mattered an iota.

From the first day of his administration, President Trump signaled that he has little use for the international order. Since taking office, he has pursued his “America First” foreign policy with gusto, withdrawing from an Asia-Pacific trade agreement, the Paris climate accord (on how to fight global warming and reduce greenhouse gas emissions), the Iran nuclear deal or, more properly, the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), and even the World Health Organization. He has questioned the value of NATO and sought to undermine the World Trade Organization.

In his acceptance speech, Trump did not mention that his unilateral action to withdraw from the JCPOA has been a breach of promise that has weakened America’s position globally, which is reflected in a number of recent votes in the United Nations. Within the UN, the U.S. is more isolated than ever before. When the administration asked the U.N. Security Council to reimpose sanctions on Iran this month, the Dominican Republic was the only country to side with the United States.

Trump claimed to reduce the U.S. troop presence in the three countries where the American military has been most active — Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. However, the conflicts have not been resolved, and many in the U.S. national security establishment say the U.S. should maintain at least a limited presence to prevent a resurgence of heavy fighting.

Remember: four years ago, Donald Trump promised that Mexico would pay for the wall he wanted to build along the U.S.-Mexico border? In his speech, Trump claimed, “We have already built 300 miles of border wall, and we are adding 10 new miles every single week.  The wall will soon be complete

The facts are,  275 miles of that wall have been built and  Mexico has not paid a penny. While Congress has authorized some spending for the project, most of the money for wall construction has been redirected from the military at the president’s insistence. Last week, his former advisor Steve Bannon and three others were indicted on charges that they siphoned hundreds of thousands of dollars each from the wall fund for their own personal use. Bannon has pleaded not guilty.

In the midst of race riots, defunding the police in some cities have become a major issue, which Biden opposes. And yet, the issue is exploited by Trump to portray Biden as the future of disorder. He said, “Make no mistake, if you give power to Joe Biden, the radical left will defund police departments all across America.  They will pass federal legislation to reduce law enforcement nationwide.  They will make every city look like Democrat-run Portland, Oregon.”

Before ending his 70-minute long speech, Trump promised to deliver, And on November 3rd, we will make America safer.  We will make America stronger.  We will make America prouder.  And we will make America greater than ever before.”

For years ago, Trump promised to make America “great” again. That did not happen. America is isolated internationally, and remains divided and polarized internally, as never before. The words ‘great’, ‘safe’, ‘strong’ and ‘proud’ have all been abused and lost their usual meanings and luster under his administration. Can American voters afford to have four more years of nightmare with Trump back in the White House? I know my answer: it’s a “no”.

Adios, Mr. Trump.

CAIR Calls House Democrats’ Appointment of Israel’s ‘Most Committed Enablers’ to Foreign Affairs Committee an Insult to Voters and Desperate Attempt to Shield Israel from Accountability

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, today expressed deep c...