Sunday, September 27, 2026

Message from Maung Zarni

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

TMS Digest: How Would Peace-Making Fare Against Israel’s “Elimination Project” in the Occupied Palestine & Trump’s Annihilation Threat Against Iranian People.

On issues that devastate communities and pain us all with capacity for empathy, including the unfolding ecological crisis, Israel’s wars USA fights & genocide it funds & NATO’s losing war in Ukraine.

Sep 27
 
READ IN APP
 

Dear TMS Colleagues, Members, and Supporters,

I put this week’s digest with a heavy heart and a burning question:

how do you make peace with powerful forces that seek to eradicate, annihilate and eliminate things and human groups at whim, and as an act of declared policy objective?

Before I get to the heart or thematic items directly relevant to those who long for peace on earth, I would first like to request the TMS community to email me (at fanon2005@gmail.com) any items – your own and/or others’ – that you think need wide circulation within our TMS network -and beyond.

Second, in putting these digests and special issues, I use as my own analytical guide Karl Marx’s historical and structural insight into history-making, of which peace activism-scholarship is an inseparable part.

Worth quoting the big man here:

“Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living.” (Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte)

To be sure, Marx was wrong on many things, but as the late Isiah Berlin pointedly wrote, “you can disagree with Marx, but you cannot not engage with him”, if you are serious about analysing world affairs, that is, organized human activities.

I pay closer attention to the fundamental forces that influence, create, or shape these circumstances under which we seek to make peace, agitate for peace activism, and educate one another.

My “madness” has a method, and it is rooted in Marxian structuralist readings of humans.

Of the many contributing factors to the sordid state of our world, the two rogue UN member states of USA-Israel, the Axis of Evil, their words and deeds, are of disproportionate significance.

I compiled this week’s digest with a heavy heart.

For two of the most influential UN member states, both nuclear-armed and rogue – joined in the hips – USA and Israel –sent their heads of state to make their unconcealed Hitlerite threats against the targeted national populations in the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Occupied Palestine, (92 million and 7-8 million peoples, respectively).

Both Trump and Netanyahu, unarguably war criminals, however international law including the Genocide Convention is interpreted, put the UN Charter to a giant shredder. The charter was designed to prevent the scourge of another world war after the senseless mass murder 100 million humans worldwide between 1938 and 1945.

We live a short drive from Winston Churchill’s home of 25 years named Chartwell where visitors can view his type-written letter to his US counterpart President FDR in a glass display case. After several visits to the English man’s house – now a museum – his words to FDR, “nations united against evil”, have etched in my memory. This is of course irrespective of the fact that Churchill the man was not known for his virtues or humanity, but rather associated with concentration camps and genocidal colonial repression in places like Kenya post-Nazi genocide in Europe.

Throughout my nearly four-decades of involvement in international affairs, with my personal focus on my Buddha-forsaken native country of Burma (or Myanmar) and increasingly with respect to genocides, I have long considered this august body medically dead. Its 5- veto-wielders have used and misused international law and the collective space for all member states as they deem fit.

I felt I was witnessing the funeral of the UN when I was watching US President Donald Trump and ICC’s wanted Benjamin Netanyahu at the podium tell brazen lies, hurling insults and making outrageous threats against large-scale human communities, unbefitting their official positions as President and Prime Minister.

By and large, much of the Western/European leaders in governments, legislatures, religious bodies and culture and intellectual institutions have been silent in the face of the two very public acts of the brazen violation of the UN Charter by the reigning American and Jewish Supremacists with their power to unleash their nukes on any “enemy” population.

The burning question inside my head is the following:

how do peace activists, professionals (scholars and/or practitioners) and public who just want to live in peace respond to the declarations of intent for annihilation and elimination of our fellow human communities?

Neither war nor peace is the exclusive domain of We the Moderns, to belabour the obvious. Many thousands of years ago – and in all human communities, making wars against and seeking peace with enemy populations has been integral to mental cultures.

Even medieval sieges were aimed at bringing the defiant and resistant enemy (in the walled or fortified city-state or kingdom) to military surrender. POWs were taken away as additional sources of labour, skilled and otherwise. Resources taken over, treasuries looted, women mass-raped.

But the Trumpian declaration of annihilation of Iran and Israel’s pursuit of “Mein Kampf in reverse” or as B’Tselem’s scathing report of the Jewish Supremacist state’s “Elimination Project” (against the entire Occupied Territories, after the flattened Gaza) pose the single greatest intellectual and moral challenge to the community of peace scholars, peace thinkers and peace activists.

Over 3,000 years ago history’s first-recorded written peace treaty was sealed between the Indo-Aryan Hittite kingdom, known as Hattusa, in present-day Turkiye, and its enemy kingdom of Egyptian pharaohs.

After our my family visit to Hattusa from Ankara this past summer, our Turkish host Mehmet Öztürk who retired his editorship of World Languages at Anadolu News Agency took us to his native city of Corum. Thanks to Mehmet’s arrangement the city’s mayor and a former Turkish academic Dr Halil Ibrahim Asgin received us in his office and gifted our family with a replica of The Kadesh Treaty signed in BC 286.

I am sharing the photo of this replica here.

Photos by Maung Zarni, 27 Sept 2026.

In the history of Buddhist thoughts, Gotama the Buddha (or the Enlightened Human, not the Almighty Creator rooted in Abrahamic monotheistic faiths) was said to have inserted himself between the two warring kings and sought to mediate their conflict, on the verge of bloodbath.

I am sure there are other religious and scriptural systems of thought peace is a goal, a way of life, and a value.

Alas, the world today, that is, humanity at large, face two fundamental existential threats: the emerging ecological crisis and the decaying US Empire on its last leg, and aspiring Jewish Supremacist Empire, both hellbent on resorting to elimination and annihilation as their declared methods.

Read on.

Peace,

Zarni


Iceland FM hits back at Netanyahu over ‘moral cowards’ UNGA remark

 Iceland FM hits back at Netanyahu over ‘moral cowards’ UNGA remark | United Nations | Al Jazeera

.

NewsFeed

Iceland FM hits back at Netanyahu over ‘moral cowards’ UNGA remark

Iceland’s Foreign Minister Thorgerdur Katrin Gunnarsdottir hit back at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after he called diplomats who walked out of his UN address ‘moral cowards’. She said the term applies instead to leaders who ‘repeatedly disrespect international law’.

Massive Attack singer arrested over pro-Palestine protest in UK

 Massive Attack singer arrested over pro-Palestine protest in UK | Gaza | Al Jazeera

NewsFeed

Massive Attack singer arrested over pro-Palestine protest in UK

A singer from English band Massive Attack, Robert Del Naja, was arrested in Liverpool while protesting genocide in Gaza and denouncing the UK’s ban on Palestine Action. Demonstrators had gathered to demand the UK stops arming Israel ahead of the first Labour Party conference under new Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

Muslims protest planned demolition of ‘600-year-old’ mosque in India

 Muslims protest planned demolition of ‘600-year-old’ mosque in India | Government News | Al Jazeera


Muslims protest planned demolition of ‘600-year-old’ mosque in India

Hundreds of Muslims have gathered in the Indian city of Ujjain to protest the partial demolition of a mosque they say is more than 600 years old. The BJP-led state government says the action is needed to widen roads ahead of the 2028 Hindu pilgrimage, which is expected to draw large crowds.

‘Better deal’: What’s behind Trump’s rejection of Iran’s truce offer?

 Donald Trump has rejected Iran’s latest proposal to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz as experts say the United States president believes Washington has more to gain by waiting than by accepting Tehran’s terms at this moment.

“I reject their proposal,” Trump told reporters on Saturday, arguing that Iran wants an agreement because it is “losing so badly”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“They want to make a deal, and I think that’s fine,” Trump said. “I’d like to make a deal too. But that deal would not be acceptable.”

On Sunday, Iranian ⁠⁠Foreign ⁠⁠Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran had ⁠⁠seen the initial reaction from ‌‌Trump to its proposal but had yet to receive a response through ⁠⁠mediators. In the latest diplomatic efforts, Qatar has played a role in mediating talks between Iran and the US on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York.

Iran’s seven-day proposal included Washington lifting its naval blockade of Iranian ports, waiving sanctions on Iranian oil sales, releasing an estimated $12bn in frozen Iranian assets and observing a wider regional ceasefire, including in Lebanon and Yemen.

Iran would then reopen the Strait of Hormuz and begin negotiations with Washington on a final agreement.

The latest proposals are similar to the June memorandum of understanding (MoU) the two countries signed. But the MoU collapsed last month due to differences on the terms of the deal, which resulted in an escalation in attacks, particularly in and around the Strait of Hormuz, which essentially remains under Iranian blockade.

According to experts, Trump’s rejection suggested that while both sides continue to publicly leave the door open for diplomacy, they remain far apart over who should make the first concessions.

“Trump’s calculation looks fairly straightforward. He believes the combination of the naval blockade and economic isolation is finally squeezing Iran hard enough that Tehran’s latest proposal is evidence of weakness rather than an offer Washington needs to seize,” Andreas Krieg, associate professor at King’s College London, told Al Jazeera.

His public argument that Iran is “losing badly” is important because it suggests he thinks time is improving the US bargaining position, Krieg said.

INTERACTIVE - MIDDLE EAST -iran - hormuz - shipping - aug 27, 2026-1787815800
(Al Jazeera)

Why does Trump think he can wait?

A key part of Trump’s calculation appears to be a belief that the economic pressure on Iran has not yet run its course.

The Trump administration has escalated economic pressure on Tehran, tightening its naval blockade while imposing sanctions targeting Iranian oil revenues and threatening secondary sanctions against countries doing business with Tehran.

Last week, the US imposed aviation sanctions on Iran, disrupting flights. This came weeks after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced an economic pressure campaign against Iran, promising to target Tehran’s financial interests across the world.

Richard Weitz, a senior nonresident associate fellow at the NATO Defence College, told Al Jazeera that the White House may believe it can “wait a bit and get better terms”.

There is also concern in Washington about Iran’s proposed sequencing, he said.

Therefore, Weitz said Washington may be calculating that “economic pressure over time will induce the Iranian government to make more concessions”.

“This is what occurred arguably a decade ago, leading to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal as the Iranian government decided it [the US] needed to end the economic sanctions in return for making concessions on its nuclear programme,” he added.

It is, therefore, possible that “we could see the same kind of trade-off in the coming months”.

Iran could make Trump ‘pay’

However, waiting for a deal also carries considerable political risk for the US president, experts said, because his Republican Party could lose November’s midterm elections.

A late August Reuters/Ipsos poll suggested 63 percent of Americans opposed the US-Israel war on Iran while 31 percent supported it. Rising fuel and transportation costs could also feed into broader cost-of-living concerns before the elections.

The problem for Trump is that time does not only increase pressure on Iran, Krieg said. “The gamble is that time cuts both ways,” he noted.

Israel’s Smotrich calls for ‘war’ in West Bank: Rhetoric or real threat?

 Israel’s far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has called for a full-scale war in the occupied West Bank, urging the military to use the tactics employed in Gaza, which has been devastated by the ongoing genocide.

Smotrich, known for his inflammatory, racist and dehumanising language against Palestinians, also called for the annexation of southern Lebanon and Gaza’s territories under Israeli control.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The minister told Ynet News in an interview published on Sunday that Israel should “go to war” in the occupied territory and repeat what it “did in Gaza”. His comments come about a month ahead of the general election, which has seen a surge in Israeli and settler violence in the occupied territories, as well as the demonisation of Palestinian citizens of Israel.

During the Ynet News interview, Smotrich said that Israel should “do there what we did in Gaza” in response to a question on how Israel should combat the increasing “security tensions” in the occupied West Bank.

So what did the minister – who has been sanctioned by a number of Western countries along with his Cabinet colleague Itamar Ben-Gvir – say, and should it be taken seriously or regarded as just election rhetoric?

What did Smotrich say about the occupied West Bank?

In his trademark incendiary style, Smotrich said he has “solutions” to the ongoing pogroms in the occupied West Bank. Since Israel launched its ongoing genocidal war in Gaza, it has stepped up its crackdown in the West Bank, arrested thousands—many of them without any formal charges—and looked the other way as settler pogroms continue in the West Bank.

“I think we need to go to war in Judea and Samaria, to do there what we did in Gaza, to dismantle the Palestinian Authority, which is a terror authority,” he told Ynet News, referring to the biblical name for the West Bank. The Palestinian Authority governs the West Bank following the Oslo Accords.

Israeli forces have “cleared out” Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank and he added: “We need to tell the [Israeli military]: Just as you dismantled Hamas in Gaza, there won’t be terror infrastructure in Judea and Samaria. No terrorists, no weapons, no tunnels”.

That’s alarming rhetoric, warned Suhad Bishara, the legal director of Adalah – the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel.

“Smotrich is not only proposing a ‘war’ on Palestinians in the West Bank, he is already waging one,” Bishara told Al Jazeera.

“The refugee camps he boasts of having ‘cleared out’ have been destroyed and their residents forcibly displaced.”

“His call to ‘do there what we did in Gaza,’ where Israel has carried out a genocidal campaign of mass killing, starvation and destruction, is a public declaration of intent to commit war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide against Palestinians in the West Bank,” she said.

Smotrich additionally pushed to annex the territory the Israeli military controls in Gaza, demarcated by the so-called “Yellow Line”, where the Israeli army withdrew to under the first phase of the Gaza “ceasefire”. Israeli military maps indicate the line extends 1.5km and 6.5km (0.9 to 4 miles) inside Gaza from its eastern boundary with Israel and covers roughly 58 percent of the enclave.

Since the “ceasefire” took effect, Israeli attacks have killed at least 1,408 Palestinians. At least 74,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel since October 2023, according to the enclave’s health ministry, with much of the besieged territory reduced to rubble.

Legal scholars and campaigners have dubbed Israel’s military actions in Gaza a genocide. A UN commission of inquiry panel last September said that Israel committed genocide in Gaza.

2:41
  • Now Playing
    02:41
    West Bank village under pressure: Settler attacks target its last remaining farmland

    West Bank village under pressure: Settler attacks target its last remaining farmland

  • Next
    01:53
    Mass shootings in South Africa: 27 people killed in two separate attacks

    Mass shootings in South Africa: 27 people killed in two separate attacks

  • 02:20
    Thai capital flooding: Police help evacuate thousands of people from homes

    Thai capital flooding: Police help evacuate thousands of people from homes

  • 02:37
    Russia denies plans for new mobilisation as Ukraine warns of reservist call-up

    Russia denies plans for new mobilisation as Ukraine warns of reservist call-up

  • 01:53
    US installation commemorates victims of South African ‘white genocide’

    US installation commemorates victims of South African ‘white genocide’

What were Smotrich’s remarks about Lebanon?

The leader of the far-right Religious Zionism party also called for annexing southern Lebanon.

“I would very much like to annex at least up to the “Yellow Line” in Gaza and up to the Litani [River] in Lebanon,” said Smotrich.

He added that annexing parts of Gaza and Lebanon would make Israel’s enemies “pay a price” for the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023.

Israel continues to occupy southern Lebanon and Israeli shelling and demolitions have also continued there, despite a US-brokered “ceasefire” in June.

Smotrich’s call to annex the West Bank, parts of Gaza and southern Lebanon is a “declared plan to seize occupied land by force and make its theft permanent, which is absolutely prohibited under international law,” said Bishara.

Last week, Lebanon’s Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, speaking at the United Nations General Assembly in New York, demanded a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanese territory up to its internationally recognised border.

Israeli attacks in southern Lebanon have killed at least 4,386 people and wounded 12,407 since March 2, when the current Hezbollah-Israel war started. Since then, Israeli forces have occupied up to 600sq km of Lebanese territory up to the Litani River.

How have Palestinian authorities responded?

The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the Israeli politician’s comments are an “explicit invitation to escalate the aggression and commit more crimes against our Palestinian people”.

They “reveal the truth of the Israeli plans aimed at implementing attempts at annexation and displacement”, the ministry said in a statement, adding that it would undermine the possibility of establishing an independent Palestinian state.

The threats are a translation of the policies pursued by the Israeli government “of killing, displacement, settlement, and land confiscation and an attempt to impose a new reality by force on the occupied Palestinian land”, it also said.

The ministry urged the international community to take action against Israel’s “aggression”.

6:55
Smotrich competes for right-wing votes: Settlement expansion projects improve prospects

Has Smotrich made similar comments in the past?

The far-right leader has a long history of inflammatory statements about Palestinians, followed by policies and actions reflecting his hardline positions as a key member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right government since 2022.

He has previously called on Israel to annex more than 80 percent of the West Bank. Smotrich along with Netanyahu has publicly opposed the so-called two-state solution. Settlement expansion is the biggest hurdle in the realisation of a sovereign and independent Palestinian state living side by side with Israel.

In July, Smotrich said Israel has launched a “revolution in settlement” expansion, after the Israeli cabinet approved the establishment of 13 new illegal settlements in the central occupied West Bank. That followed June’s announcement of 2,162 new Jewish homes in a new illegal settlement near Jerusalem.

In campaigning for next month’s election, he has promised yet more expansions of Israeli settlements in the territory.

“Settler violence, carried out under army protection, is driving entire communities from their land and settlement expansion under his authority has reached unprecedented levels,” said Bishara.

In May, Smotrich said the ⁠⁠⁠⁠International Criminal ⁠⁠⁠⁠Court (ICC)  had ⁠⁠⁠⁠requested a warrant for his arrest. The ICC’s accusations centre on the minister’s forced displacement orders for Palestinians, his support for moving Israeli settlers into occupied territory and his claim it may be “justified and moral” to starve Palestinians in Gaza.

Last September, before the “ceasefire” in Gaza, Smotrich said there was a “business plan” to turn the Strip into a “real estate bonanza”, stating that he had been discussing with the Trump administration how to share the proceeds.

In March, he also threatened to turn the southern suburbs of Lebanon’s capital into another Gaza Strip.

Are Smotrich’s calls just rhetoric ahead of elections or real threats?

Smotrich’s words should not be dismissed as mere election rhetoric, warned Bishara.

“They are a warning and states must take concrete, immediate measures to halt the assault on Palestinians and the commission of egregious crimes against them,” she said.

Analysts agreed with the human rights lawyer’s assessment.

“[Smotrich’s comment is] very much a reflection of what he has been doing in the West Bank for the last four years and what he would like to continue to do if he stays in power,” Mairav Zonszein, an analyst on Israel-Palestine at the International Crisis Group, told Al Jazeera.

“Him and this government and the settler movement that he funds and resources … they are at war in the West Bank.”

She explained that Smotrich and his allies have used settlement expansion and settler violence not only to expand their control, but also to provoke a Palestinian response.

“And any response by Palestinians is met with even more ferocious force,” said Zonszein.

Smotrich is not just gearing up for next month’s election – he has a calculated vision of wanting to continue his expansionist policies, she said.

“It’s the government’s vision, and it’s what they’ve been doing, and this is what they will continue to do as long as they’re in power.”

Yossi Mekelberg, a senior fellow on Israel-Palestine at Chatham House, said that while Smotrich’s comments may be a part of his election campaign, “what is now rhetoric, tomorrow may be policy”.

“We are exactly a month from the election … If this is the tone … and this is what’s presented to the voters and if someone like him on the basis of this ideology will be elected again, he might find it as [an] endorsement of this kind of attitude,” Mekelberg told Al Jazeera.

0:39
Israel's Smotrich calls for settlements, ‘conquest’ of Gaza Strip

Message from Maung Zarni

  Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more TMS Digest: How Would Peace-Making Fare Against Israel’s “Elimination Project” in the Occup...