Sunday, September 13, 2026

My interview on India - Habib Siddiqui

 My interview on India vis-a-vis my latest book: 'Modif-fied' India: the Transformation of a nation - can be viewed by clicking the link here: Modi-fied India: The Transformation of a Nation | Justice For All Now

I am curious to know your opinion. As you guessed, it is difficult to cover everything in the book in such a short interview, and more could have been said, of course, time permitting. Please, share your comments in the link above or on this blog as a message. 

Orlando Bloom begs for international aid at world's largest refugee camp as cuts fuel crisis

 image.png


More than one million refugees live in a network of 33 camps in Cox's Bazar in Bangladesh


Thousands of ramshackle homes line up row after row in the world’s largest refugee camp - as international aid cuts risk plunging fleeing Rohingya Muslims further into a humanitarian crisis.

stonishing drone footage shows the scale of the site at Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, where more than 1 million people are struggling to survive in a network of 33 squalid camps. Cuts to international aid - including an expected 40 per cent slash to UK budgets - has threatened to leave a generation of children lost.

Now UNICEF is warning they are facing a £10 million funding gap, as they revealed Bangladesh alone has suffered a 56 per cent in bilateral UK aid. Today Hollywood star Orlando Bloom, 49, who visited the camp last year, urged global leaders to step up and help those most at risk of exploitation.
image.png

UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador Orlando Bloom visited the camp at Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, last year to meet children(Image: © UNICEF/UNI894760/Royena Rasnat. All rights reserved.)

The Pirates of the Caribbean actor told the Mirror: "The children I met in Cox's Bazar had dreams for their future. Today, those dreams are at risk. Funding cuts are pushing essential services to breaking point, leaving Rohingya children more vulnerable to illness, violence and missing out on education.

"These children have already endured unimaginable hardship. Their childhoods should not depend on political choices made thousands of miles away, including the decision to cut aid. If caring about childhood is yes in principle, it should be yes in practice.

"That means investing in the health, education and protection children need not just to survive, but to thrive, fulfil their potential and become unstoppable." It is almost a decade since a brutal campaign of persecution forced more than a million Rohingya Muslims to flee Myanmar and make a terrifying journey into neighbouring Bangladesh.

image.png

Orlando called for investment in "the health, education and protection children need not just to survive, but to thrive"(Image: © UNICEF/UNI893958/Royena Rasnat. All rights reserved.)

Since then, they have made their homes in Cox’s Bazar, where aid agencies have battled to provide a sustainable place to live. But despite their efforts, they say more than 150,000 children are unable to access education.

Elsewhere 954,616 refugees, including 290,455 children aged under five, have reported skin diseases since January 2025. More than 800 children were affected by grave violations, including abduction, recruitment, injuries and sexual violence, in the first quarter of 2026 alone.

It comes as UNICEF UK launches a new campaign, No Choice But Childhood, highlighting how conflict, extreme poverty and climate change are cutting childhood short for millions of children around the world, while aid cuts risk undermining decades of progress.

image.png

Aid agencies say cuts to international aid are undermining the progress being made in the world's largest refugee camp

Jo Rea, UNICEF UK Director of Advocacy, said: "Extreme poverty, climate change and conflict are cutting childhood short for millions of children around the world. Yet with the right investment, a different future is possible.

"As aid cuts threaten to undermine decades of progress, UNICEF UK is calling on the UK Government to dedicate 25% of its international development budget to support and strengthen the vital services and systems that children around the world rely on every day to survive and thrive."

In 2016 the Mirror visited Banfladesh and watched as thousands of Rohingya Muslims trekked for days to escape the hell of Myanmar’s Rakhine district where they were forced out by the military. They found themselves in Cox’s Bazar – 70 miles south of Bangladesh’s financial capital Chittagong.

image.png

In 2016 the Mirror's Dan Warburton visited the Cox's Bazar camp to see first-hand the conditions facing fleeing Rohingya Muslims(Image: Sunday Mirror)

Myanmar is overwhelmingly Bhuddist and regards the Rohingya as illegal immigrants. The clan – the world’s largest group of stateless people – have been denied citizenship.

The current cycle of misery began in 2012 when rioting left 200 dead, mainly Rohingya. Muslims were largely driven out of the cities and 130,000 set up home in camps in Bangladesh.

An FCDO Spokesperson said: "The UK remains committed to supporting some of the world's most vulnerable people, with over 70% of all UK geographic support allocated to the most fragile and conflict-affected states.

"Across our development work, children remain a priority, including through programmes that boost education outcomes, tackle child malnutrition, champion the rights of women and girls, support vital healthcare services and respond to the climate crisis."

Saturday, September 12, 2026

9/11: 25 years later - my essay - Habib Siddiqui

 It was a clear and sunny morning in Philadelphia on Tuesday, September 11, 2001. The kind of morning that makes you believe the world is orderly, predictable, even beautiful. A cold front had swept through the night before, leaving behind crisp air and cloudless blue skies. I was in Bristol, Pennsylvania, teaching a corporate class on Operational Excellence — twenty-two scientists, engineers, and managers from across the world gathered for their Six Sigma Black Belt training. We had barely begun the session when the news arrived: a plane had struck the North Tower of the World Trade Center at 8:46 a.m. Seventeen minutes later, the second plane hit the South Tower.

We stopped the class and asked travelers to rebook their flights. The world had changed in an instant.

Late that afternoon, driving home on what should have been a routine commute, I saw vehicles with banners calling for the extermination of Muslims. I had lived in the United States for decades. I had worked with people from every background. I had believed — perhaps naively — that bigotry was a fringe sentiment, not something respectable people carried in their hearts. But that day, the masks fell. The hatred was open, loud, and terrifying.

When I reached home, I turned on the television and watched the endless loop of planes hitting towers, the Pentagon burning, and the fourth plane crashing in Pennsylvania. For two days, I worked from home, trying to make sense of what had happened. When I returned to the office on Friday, I heard whispers — racist, bigoted comments from people I had once respected. It pained me deeply. A slight push had revealed their inner selves: intolerance, suspicion, and a willingness to blame millions of innocent people for the actions of a few. Within hours of the event, several Muslims were lynched; even bearded Sikhs were not spared. Anyone Muslim-looking was a fair game to the racists and bigots.

Twenty-five years have passed since that morning. America has changed — not for the better. The world has changed — not for the better. And the questions that emerged in the aftermath still haunt us.

In the years since 9/11, countless theories have circulated — some wild, some plausible, some deeply unsettling. Why were certain Israelis seen videotaping on top of a white van in a Jersey City parking lot with the burning towers behind them while they appeared "happy" rather than shocked? Why were they quietly released? Why did bomb-like residues appear in some analyses of the debris? Why did the towers collapse in ways that seemed, to some engineers, eerily similar to controlled demolitions? Why did the official narrative leave so many gaps?

I am not here to endorse any particular theory. But I am here to say that the unanswered questions have fueled mistrust, especially among communities who already felt targeted. As a level-headed Muslim, I understand why some Muslims — seeing endless wars, drone strikes, occupations, and double standards — feel radicalized against American policies. When a superpower supports Israeli actions in Palestine without restraint, when it dismisses Palestinian suffering as collateral damage, when it refuses to act as an honest broker, resentment grows.

But resentment is not the same as responsibility. Muslim hatred did not trigger 9/11. As I wrote in 2002, refuting Bernard Lewis’s disingenuous theories, the roots of the tragedy lie not in Islam but in political grievances, historical injustices, and decades of one-sided policies in the Middle East.

The Wars That Followed — And the Innocents Who Paid the Price

What happened after 9/11 was not justice — it was vengeance. It was never a “war on terror,” but a war of terror, a forever war that reshaped the world in the worst possible ways.

Afghanistan was bombed relentlessly. Donald Rumsfeld even boasted that the U.S. had “run out of targets.” What crime had ordinary Afghans committed? Most had never heard of the World Trade Center. Their only sin was living in a country where Osama bin Laden had taken refuge.

Then came Iraq — a nation with no connection to 9/11. But the neoconservatives wanted war. Israel wanted war. And George W. Bush wanted revenge for Saddam Hussein’s perceived insults to his father. The world was told that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. None were found. Saddam was hanged. And from the ashes of that war emerged ISIS — a monster far more brutal than anything that existed before.

The human toll of these wars has been catastrophic. According to the Cost of War project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, U.S.-led wars since 2001 have directly or indirectly killed an estimated 4.5 to 4.7 million people — roughly 940,000 through direct violence and another 3.6 to 3.8 million from disease, malnutrition, and war-related health complications. More than 38 million people across Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, the Philippines, Libya and Syria have been displaced by the post-9/11 wars, either abroad or within their own countries.

It is a scale of suffering that should have forced the world to rethink its path, yet the opposite happened. The world has not known peace since. Instead, 9/11 became the launchpad for a global crusade against Muslims. Zionists, Hindutvadis, radical Buddhist nationalists, and Western Islamophobes found common cause in portraying Muslims as threats to be contained rather than citizens to be respected. They passed laws banning hijabs, restricting mosques, surveilling communities, and demonizing elected officials with Muslim names.

In the United States, Islamophobia surged. CAIR documented 8,683 cases of discrimination last year — the highest ever recorded. Politicians openly called for Muslims to be expelled from states. Others claimed that every Muslim in public office was a threat to national security.

And yet, in this hostile climate, Muslim Americans did something extraordinary: they organized, mobilized, and won elections.

Zohran Mamdani became New York City’s first Muslim mayor. Abdul El-Sayed won the Democratic Senate primary in Michigan. Muslim representation in Congress may soon reach historic levels. These victories were not handed to them. They were earned through grassroots organizing, coalition building, and moral courage.

But even now, Mamdani faces attempts to bar him from attending the 9/11 commemoration ceremony — in the city he leads. Meanwhile, Rudy Giuliani, a convicted felon who spent 25 years milking 9/11 for personal gain, is welcomed with open arms.

The hypocrisy is staggering.

Another dark legacy of 9/11 is torture. The CIA ran black sites across the world. Medical professionals helped design and monitor torture techniques. Prisoners were waterboarded, beaten, deprived of sleep, and subjected to horrors that violated every moral and legal standard.

And no one was held accountable.

Obama acknowledged, “We tortured some folks,” but refused to prosecute anyone. The architects of torture were promoted — Gina Haspel became CIA director, Avril Haines became Director of National Intelligence, and others rose to prestigious positions in government, academia, and the private sector.

This impunity set the stage for future abuses. When leaders are not punished for crimes, they repeat them.

The Autocratizing World We Inherited

The last 25 years have seen a global slide toward authoritarianism. Trump, Modi, Netanyahu — leaders who weaponize fear, nationalism, and religious identity — have reshaped politics. Democracies have weakened. Inequality has soared. Billionaires multiply while billions struggle to buy food. Gas prices rise. Wars continue. And truth becomes harder to find.

We are not better off today than we were before 9/11. Not morally. Not politically. Not economically.

Yet, not everything is lost. Despite the darkness, there is hope. Despite opposition from powerful lobbies, candidates like Mamdani, Wahab, and El-Sayed have won elections. Despite Islamophobia, Muslim Americans have built alliances with Latinos, African Americans, Jews, and progressive whites. Despite attempts to silence them, they speak boldly for justice, equality, and peace.

Their victories prove that America is still capable of renewal.

We may never know the full truth of 9/11. But history teaches us that truth eventually emerges. What matters now is what we do with the lessons we already have — that peace without justice is an illusion, that political problems cannot be solved with military solutions, that a superpower must be an honest broker, not a partisan actor, that hatred breeds hatred while justice breeds peace, and that accountability is essential because without it, impunity becomes policy.

Twenty-five years later, the world is more dangerous, more divided, and more fragile. But it is not beyond repair. If we confront the past honestly, reject hatred, demand accountability, and insist on justice — real justice — we can still build a future worthy of those who died on that clear, sunny morning.

[Dr. Siddiqui is a peace and human rights activist who is author of several books including: Democracy, Politics and Terrorism - America's Quest for Security in the Age of Insecurity (2008)]

 

  1. South Asia Journal; https://realovi.wordpress.com/2026/09/12/why-9-11-still-haunts-us-and-why-accountability-still-matters-by-habib-siddiqui/
  2. Older links are: 
    1. 9/11: 25 years later: https://countercurrents.org/2026/09/a-quarter-century-later-the-wounds-of-9-11-still-shape-our-fate/
    2.  https://realovi.wordpress.com/2026/09/12/why-9-11-still-haunts-us-and-why-accountability-still-matters-by-habib-siddiqui/
    3.   New Age | What we lost, what we learnt, what still haunts us

Hong Kong jails Tiananmen vigil activists for seven years

 Hong Kong jails Tiananmen vigil activists for seven years | News | Al Jazeera


A Hong Kong court sentenced two pro-democracy activists to seven years in prison, and a third to five years, for organising vigils to commemorate the Tiananmen Square massacre. Judges accused them of violating China’s constitution by calling for an ‘end to one-party dictatorship’.

Chileans clash over 9/11 military coup legacy

 Chileans clash over 9/11 military coup legacy | History | Al Jazeera

Chileans clash over 9/11 military coup legacy

NewsFeed

Chileans clash over 9/11 military coup legacy

Protesters and police have clashed in Chile, as the country marked 53 years since Augusto Pinochet overthrew President Salvador Allende in a US-backed coup. Many Chileans say the current far-right government is trying to rehabilitate Pinochet’s image.

What did US intelligence know before the 9/11 attacks?

 By Nils Adler

Twenty-five years after the September 11 attacks, the CIA has released a series of presidential briefing documents showing what United States leaders had been told about Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda in the years before the plane hijackings that killed nearly 3,000 people.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe called the release of the documents “an act of exceptional transparency”. This is the agency’s largest-ever release of presidential daily briefs, the classified intelligence summaries written for the president and his most senior officials.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The files cover the period from February 1998 to September 12, 2001 – the day after the deadly attacks on New York City and Washington, DC – and reveal how the CIA tracked bin Laden’s movements, his financing and his networks inside the US and abroad.

In one, a briefer warns that the group behind that year’s East Africa embassy bombings “may fly an explosive-packed airplane into a US city”.

Another notes that some in bin Laden’s network had received hijack training. Others describe his hunt for materials to build a radioactive “dirty bomb”.

The documents add little new information about how the attacks were planned, but they do offer a paper trail of accumulating warnings.

Here’s a breakdown of what is in them:

What has the CIA just released?

Seventy-one presidential daily briefs spanning the period from February 1998 to September 2001. These are the highly classified intelligence summaries prepared for the president and the government’s most senior officials.

The documents run to 101 pages, with the earliest, titled Terrorists seeking WMD capability, dated February 13, 1998.

The last, Situation Report: Bin Laden’s Tracks, is dated September 12, 2001, the day after the attacks.

In between are briefs on the Taliban’s refusal to give bin Laden up, his hunt for chemical, biological and radiological weapons, his financing, and repeated warnings that he intended to strike inside the US.

Many pages are redacted to protect sources.

5:29
  • Now Playing
    05:29
    How 9/11 transformed US foreign policy over 25 years: Analysis

    How 9/11 transformed US foreign policy over 25 years: Analysis

  • Next
    01:41
     Couple welcomes child from embryo frozen for 22 years

    Couple welcomes child from embryo frozen for 22 years

  • 01:27
    Man arrested over killing of Tasia Fortune, found hanging from a tree last month

    Man arrested over killing of Tasia Fortune, found hanging from a tree last month

  • 02:20
    Jerusalem Daily: Kites for Gaza

    Jerusalem Daily: Kites for Gaza

  • 27:40
    Will Houthi gains give Iran leverage in its war with the US? | Inside Story

    Will Houthi gains give Iran leverage in its war with the US? | Inside Story

What did US intelligence know about al-Qaeda before 9/11?

A great deal, and from quite early on.

The briefs show that analysts were tracking bin Laden’s movements, the support system around him, his network inside the US and abroad, and how his operations were financed.

Some of the warnings laid out in the presidential briefs were strikingly specific. In September 1998, three years before the attacks, a briefer wrote that bin Laden’s “preferred option is to strike the US on its own soil in Washington”.

Analysts also noted his interest in unconventional weapons: Chemical, biological, and radiological.

By June 1999, the briefs included reports that bin Laden’s operatives had experimented with explosives to “increase their energy output”, part of a pursuit of so-called “dirty bombs”.

The obstacles were understood, too.

An April 1998 brief found there was no evidence the Taliban intended to hand bin Laden over, describing him as their “guest” and noting that “gratitude for his assistance during the Soviet occupation” of Afghanistan between December 1979 and February 1989 left them “reluctant to alienate him by monitoring or controlling his activities”.

How many warnings of an attack was the president given?

The warnings weren’t just occasional; they kept coming.

In 1998,1999 and 2000, there were several reports, including one titled Terrorism: Bin Laden Extremists Planning Attacks.

Then in 2001, when George W Bush took over as president from Bill Clinton, the frequency increased, and by the summer the language was increasingly alarming, with one briefing simply titled: Bin Laden Determined To Strike in US.

1:13
Families honour victims as the US marks 25 years since September 11

Did officials know planes could be used in an attack?

Yes, as early as 1998.

A brief dated September 10 that year, titled Bin Ladin’s Location and Intentions, recorded his stated preference for striking Washington, then added that the group behind that summer’s East Africa US embassy bombings “may fly an explosive-packed airplane into a US city”. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had quickly determined that those attacks had been carried out by al-Qaeda.

The same memo cautioned that intelligence gave “no conclusive information” on his intentions for future attacks.

That December, another brief described conspirators who “had evaded security checks during a recent trial run at an unidentified New York airport”, and noted that “some members of the Bin Laden network have received hijack training.”

That brief, dated December 4, 1998, was titled Bin Laden Preparing To Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks.

Does this prove the US government knew 9/11 was coming?

No. It may raise serious questions about why it did not appear to be more prepared, but it does not show any evidence of a lack of will by the government to prevent an attack.

The newly released material reinforces the explanation that intelligence agencies had many pieces of the puzzle but had failed to assemble them into a clear picture in time.

There is no evidence at all to support conspiracy theories about government involvement or that government officials had prior knowledge of the attacks, which have grown in popularity in the US.

Are all of these documents new?

No, some of the briefs have been made public before.

The two best-known items were already out. The August 6, 2001 brief, Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US, was declassified in 2004 at the 9/11 Commission’s request.

The broader findings are also known, including that US intelligence had tracked bin Laden’s intentions for years, that aircraft featured in the reporting, and that none of it identified the time, place, method or targets of the eventual plot. The 9/11 Commission set all of this out more than two decades ago.

The release adds the underlying documents, in the briefers’ own words, rather than a commission summary.

My interview on India - Habib Siddiqui

 My interview on India vis-a-vis my latest book: 'Modif-fied' India: the Transformation of a nation - can be viewed by clicking the ...