Sunday, July 9, 2017

Kashmir's stone-pelting protesters face off against pellet guns

India's Security forces using pellet guns to disperse crowds of stone-throwing young protesters in the Indian-ruled region of Himalayan Kashmir have killed more than 100 people, blinding hundreds and maiming thousands over the past year.
The protests have unleashed a political crisis in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, governed for the first time by a regional party in coalition with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party, which draws support from India's Hindu majority.
The clashes, sparked by the killing of separatist militant Burhan Wani by security forces on July 8 last year, have recently spread to college campuses and schools.
They are drawing a new generation into a decades-old struggle for 'azaadi', or independence, for India's only Muslim-majority region, which is also claimed by neighboring Pakistan.
"If I get a weapon, I am ready to join the militancy – but for the time being, the stone is our weapon," said one 23-year-old student, who asked not to be identified.
He is one among many young men in the state's summer capital of Srinagar who find themselves fighting street battles, slinging stones at pellet gun-wielding police officers from their own communities, and even their own families.

"My father is in the police, posted in Srinagar," the protester added. "He used to tell me to join the police, but now he does not insist."
Slender employment prospects prompt many residents of Srinagar to join the police force.
"I am the son of a farmer and joined the police as I had no job," said one 25-year-old officer.

"We are part of the same society, and using force against children is very difficult for us. We try to exercise maximum restraint – that is why we get injured."
Pellet guns are intended not to be lethal, but their use by India's security forces has caused severe injuries and the deaths of several bystanders, women and children among them.
Human rights groups have urged India to renounce their use, calling it a violation of United Nations' principles of restraint.

No comments:

Post a Comment