Sunita Paul’s accusations only depict her inane psychosis
Ref: http://www.americanchronicle..com/articles/view/98680
Sunita Paul claims that AL sympathizers are very disturbed about her write-ups on the Peel Khana massacre, asking her to refrain from writing. She even discloses two such letters from two sympathizers, although we truly don’t know if these were not cooked-up letters to deceive her readers, something that is quite habitual with her. After all, she has not answered my question as to how did she come to learn of what was discussed between Joy and Sohel Taj. Her first-hand narrative of what the two individuals had discussed in their meeting is simply too unbelievable for any rational intelligent being to take her seriously.
Of pressing interest to us is her claim that on April 14 she received a letter from an ex-ambassador of Bangladesh. In this one, unlike the two previous notes, she does not share the name of the individual writer. Given her history of lies, deception, deceit and rumor-mongering, how seriously can we take her on this matter? She claims that the ambassador wrote: "I have gone through some classified documents related to the BDR massacre from the investigation files of probe committees, which evidently show that, mostly Jamaat and BNP leaders were behind this massacre." Her concoction cannot go any better! I have difficulty in believing that such "classified" information on investigation is now made available to an ex-ambassador, whoever he was. Interestingly, Sunita herself is not unaware of this inanity, and as such to dilute our doubt to her make-believe story, she also questions how the ambassador could have seen those "classified” documents related to the BDR massacre from the investigation files of probe committees? Well tried to guess our doubts, but no cigar yet!
It is said that liars like thieves leave their trails behind. There are too many loose ends left by Sunita Paul, too! Just ponder on the last paragraph where the ambassador presumably threatens her: "Moreover, for the sake of national security, Bangladesh government may enforce ban on the online editions of those newspapers publishing your write ups, if you will not please start writing and reporting the truth. For such gracious help, not only Awami League and the present government shall be grateful but, we shall even be ready to duly compensate your valued cooperation in due course of time." How believable are the above claims? Earth is flat! How does the ex-ambassador know that government will enforce ban on on-line publication? More importantly, how about the promise of duly compensating Sunita as a hush money? Such accusations sound too silly, too unbelievable to take her seriously!
Sunita is obviously angry with all individuals that disagree with her yellow journalism, including those who had unmasked her true evil self. She writes, "Some of the people term me as a ´plagiarist´ whiles some as ´fraud´ or ´liar´. Why? Just because, I am not bowing down to the immoral proposal by the ruling party in writing in exchange of money. These blogger are hired ´web terrorists´ of the ruling regime in Dhaka." Silly conclusions by a dumb-headed person! First, she fails to offer any refutation against the charge of plagiarism that was made against her by blogger Mashuqur Rahman in his Daily Star article. And then she brands everyone that questioned her veracity as being 'web terrorists' for the ruling party! Such a charge is not only ludicrous it is also insolent and absolutely false. She wants us to believe that all those who unmasked her are upset for her not bowing down to money. Please, spare us from such self-applauding! Why not Sunita disclose who the gentleman was that had offered to buy her silence?
Sunita is very upset about my questioning the reliability of her so-called interviews and meetings with others. I questioned her interview with Kazi Azizul Huq of the Khilafat Andolon (http://bangladeshkhelafatandolan.blogspot.com/2008/06/interview-with-sunita-paul.html) since for a dumb and deaf person it is very difficult to conduct such without letter (or email) correspondences, which usually take a few exchanges to and fro to complete. I am interested to know from Mr. Huq how the interview took place.
I am also very intrigued by the Khilafat Andolon’s website. Not only does this post Mr. Huq's statements, but also some exchanges with Mr Benkin, a pro-Israeli Zionist propagandist with very negative feelings about Muslims (http://bangladeshkhelafatandolan.blogspot.com/2009_02_01_archive.html).
In the same link, you will also notice a letter from Sunita published that was sent to Mr. Huq, where she writes a letter of condolence for the death of Hafez Hamidullah. In that she writes, "May G-d reward him for his life long dedication towards humanity and good to this world." Note that the word God is spelled as G-d, a common practice among the Jewish people! So, what is the true religious identity of Sunita?
As to Sunita’s blog site, she now claims that it was a false blog with which she had no connection. However, such is news to me. Contrary to her claim, on a thorough search in the Internet, I could not find a single citation where she had denounced the site herself. The only information we have on that site is through the courtesy of Mr. Benkin, who in a letter to Ranjan Chowdhury, wrote, “Ms. Sunita Paul has very angrily refuted the post in her name. She claims that the blog was started by an imposter, not her.” (http://daily-khabor.blogspot.com/2009_02_15_archive.html) So, the matter was probably limited to those two persons and not shared broadly.
The readily available materials point out that Sunita is working in cahoots with groups whose primary motivation is to weaken our national unity for the Israeli interest. Her own writings have shown that she is an anti-Muslim bigot who holds negative feelings against Bangladeshis. Truth, sagacity, honesty and trust are not in her vocabulary. She cannot be trusted with anything to do with our people. Naturally, she is hostile to anyone that questions her immoral intent, and conveniently dumps him/her as an anti-West person, and of course, a Jew and Christian hater. No, I am not surprised by such false accusations from a literally summum, bukmun and oom’yoon!
Like a loser and moron, she mistakenly assumes that I am licking feet of western people for survival. That is utter nonsense! I feel pity for her! Surely, we can’t blame someone who prostitutes her intellect to make a filthy living, who has not known any better. With her low intellectual prowess, she can’t think better. She assumes everyone must be doing her kind of professional (or lack of intellectual) prostitution. For her information, it is the corporate America that has been licking my feet for the past quarter century to solve their complicated problems, to lead and guide them so as to function better, to execute change -- something that it could not do on its own. My expertise in various areas of specialization has been highly sought out and valued in corporate America. No wonder that until quite recently I have held the covetous position of a Director with one of the largest global companies. Let me repeat, unlike habitual liars like Sunita Paul that give bad names to journalism, I don’t have to depend on anyone’s handouts. Shame on her psychosis!
End notes:
http://sunitapaul.blogspot.com/2008/09/salah-uddin-shoaib-choudhury-rapist.html
http://www.tolpar.com/categoryblog/600-salah-uddin-shoaib-choudhury-the-rapist.html
http://www.tolpar.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=31&Itemid=46
http://daily-khabor.blogspot.com/2009_02_15_archive.html
http://interfaithstrength.blogspot.com/2009/02/fault-dear-brutus-lies-not-in-stars-but.html
http://www.bangladeshihindu.com/author/richard/
http://interfaithstrength.com/images/IDP2.htm
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/05/indian_conservatives_struggle.html
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/71564
Sunita Paul claims that AL sympathizers are very disturbed about her write-ups on the Peel Khana massacre, asking her to refrain from writing. She even discloses two such letters from two sympathizers, although we truly don’t know if these were not cooked-up letters to deceive her readers, something that is quite habitual with her. After all, she has not answered my question as to how did she come to learn of what was discussed between Joy and Sohel Taj. Her first-hand narrative of what the two individuals had discussed in their meeting is simply too unbelievable for any rational intelligent being to take her seriously.
Of pressing interest to us is her claim that on April 14 she received a letter from an ex-ambassador of Bangladesh. In this one, unlike the two previous notes, she does not share the name of the individual writer. Given her history of lies, deception, deceit and rumor-mongering, how seriously can we take her on this matter? She claims that the ambassador wrote: "I have gone through some classified documents related to the BDR massacre from the investigation files of probe committees, which evidently show that, mostly Jamaat and BNP leaders were behind this massacre." Her concoction cannot go any better! I have difficulty in believing that such "classified" information on investigation is now made available to an ex-ambassador, whoever he was. Interestingly, Sunita herself is not unaware of this inanity, and as such to dilute our doubt to her make-believe story, she also questions how the ambassador could have seen those "classified” documents related to the BDR massacre from the investigation files of probe committees? Well tried to guess our doubts, but no cigar yet!
It is said that liars like thieves leave their trails behind. There are too many loose ends left by Sunita Paul, too! Just ponder on the last paragraph where the ambassador presumably threatens her: "Moreover, for the sake of national security, Bangladesh government may enforce ban on the online editions of those newspapers publishing your write ups, if you will not please start writing and reporting the truth. For such gracious help, not only Awami League and the present government shall be grateful but, we shall even be ready to duly compensate your valued cooperation in due course of time." How believable are the above claims? Earth is flat! How does the ex-ambassador know that government will enforce ban on on-line publication? More importantly, how about the promise of duly compensating Sunita as a hush money? Such accusations sound too silly, too unbelievable to take her seriously!
Sunita is obviously angry with all individuals that disagree with her yellow journalism, including those who had unmasked her true evil self. She writes, "Some of the people term me as a ´plagiarist´ whiles some as ´fraud´ or ´liar´. Why? Just because, I am not bowing down to the immoral proposal by the ruling party in writing in exchange of money. These blogger are hired ´web terrorists´ of the ruling regime in Dhaka." Silly conclusions by a dumb-headed person! First, she fails to offer any refutation against the charge of plagiarism that was made against her by blogger Mashuqur Rahman in his Daily Star article. And then she brands everyone that questioned her veracity as being 'web terrorists' for the ruling party! Such a charge is not only ludicrous it is also insolent and absolutely false. She wants us to believe that all those who unmasked her are upset for her not bowing down to money. Please, spare us from such self-applauding! Why not Sunita disclose who the gentleman was that had offered to buy her silence?
Sunita is very upset about my questioning the reliability of her so-called interviews and meetings with others. I questioned her interview with Kazi Azizul Huq of the Khilafat Andolon (http://bangladeshkhelafatandolan.blogspot.com/2008/06/interview-with-sunita-paul.html) since for a dumb and deaf person it is very difficult to conduct such without letter (or email) correspondences, which usually take a few exchanges to and fro to complete. I am interested to know from Mr. Huq how the interview took place.
I am also very intrigued by the Khilafat Andolon’s website. Not only does this post Mr. Huq's statements, but also some exchanges with Mr Benkin, a pro-Israeli Zionist propagandist with very negative feelings about Muslims (http://bangladeshkhelafatandolan.blogspot.com/2009_02_01_archive.html).
In the same link, you will also notice a letter from Sunita published that was sent to Mr. Huq, where she writes a letter of condolence for the death of Hafez Hamidullah. In that she writes, "May G-d reward him for his life long dedication towards humanity and good to this world." Note that the word God is spelled as G-d, a common practice among the Jewish people! So, what is the true religious identity of Sunita?
As to Sunita’s blog site, she now claims that it was a false blog with which she had no connection. However, such is news to me. Contrary to her claim, on a thorough search in the Internet, I could not find a single citation where she had denounced the site herself. The only information we have on that site is through the courtesy of Mr. Benkin, who in a letter to Ranjan Chowdhury, wrote, “Ms. Sunita Paul has very angrily refuted the post in her name. She claims that the blog was started by an imposter, not her.” (http://daily-khabor.blogspot.com/2009_02_15_archive.html) So, the matter was probably limited to those two persons and not shared broadly.
The readily available materials point out that Sunita is working in cahoots with groups whose primary motivation is to weaken our national unity for the Israeli interest. Her own writings have shown that she is an anti-Muslim bigot who holds negative feelings against Bangladeshis. Truth, sagacity, honesty and trust are not in her vocabulary. She cannot be trusted with anything to do with our people. Naturally, she is hostile to anyone that questions her immoral intent, and conveniently dumps him/her as an anti-West person, and of course, a Jew and Christian hater. No, I am not surprised by such false accusations from a literally summum, bukmun and oom’yoon!
Like a loser and moron, she mistakenly assumes that I am licking feet of western people for survival. That is utter nonsense! I feel pity for her! Surely, we can’t blame someone who prostitutes her intellect to make a filthy living, who has not known any better. With her low intellectual prowess, she can’t think better. She assumes everyone must be doing her kind of professional (or lack of intellectual) prostitution. For her information, it is the corporate America that has been licking my feet for the past quarter century to solve their complicated problems, to lead and guide them so as to function better, to execute change -- something that it could not do on its own. My expertise in various areas of specialization has been highly sought out and valued in corporate America. No wonder that until quite recently I have held the covetous position of a Director with one of the largest global companies. Let me repeat, unlike habitual liars like Sunita Paul that give bad names to journalism, I don’t have to depend on anyone’s handouts. Shame on her psychosis!
End notes:
http://sunitapaul.blogspot.com/2008/09/salah-uddin-shoaib-choudhury-rapist.html
http://www.tolpar.com/categoryblog/600-salah-uddin-shoaib-choudhury-the-rapist.html
http://www.tolpar.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=31&Itemid=46
http://daily-khabor.blogspot.com/2009_02_15_archive.html
http://interfaithstrength.blogspot.com/2009/02/fault-dear-brutus-lies-not-in-stars-but.html
http://www.bangladeshihindu.com/author/richard/
http://interfaithstrength.com/images/IDP2.htm
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/05/indian_conservatives_struggle.html
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/71564
Comments
Post a Comment