New York Times article on Burma - comments
Dr Maung Zarni has written an article on Burma in the New York Times.
My letter to the New York Times is shown below:
My letter to the New York Times is shown below:
Dear
Editor,
I would like to thank the NY Times for publishing
Maung Zarni's article on Myanmar's Drive for Peace. It shows clearly the
ulterior motives of the current Thein Sein government, which is more interested
in western investment, esp. in its minority resource-rich ethnic areas than
true peace under a federal system of government. However, I am sad to see that
Mr. Zarni has failed to mention the Rohingya minority of the Rakhine/Arakan
state, which has been subject to consistent violent campaigns as documented by
the Human Rights Watch, and considered rightly by the UN as one of the most
at-risk minorities in the world.
President Thein Sein current has suggested
that all Rohingyas should be relocated to a third country and refused to
restore their citizenship cancelled in 1982, whereas the ancestors of the Rohingyas
are the first settlers of the region. The article also fails to mention the
Oil-Gas reserves of Burma, esp. the Burma-China's twin oil and gas pipelines,
which originate from Rohingya minority state of Rakhine. This is where Rohingya
property is being confiscated and land is being appropriated by the
state.
As rightly noted by Mr. Zarni, although on
the eve of independence in 1948, the Burmese nationalist leaders promised that
ethnic equality would be a cornerstone of the new Burma equality has remained
elusive.Until the promise of equality and the vision of a federated union are
genuinely pursued, the government’s offer of peace will have little effect.
Regards,
Habib Siddiqui
Comments
Post a Comment