Where Will Your Next Cup of Tea Come From?
In a casual
conversation with some friends in a popular café in the capital city Dhaka, I
was told that Bangladeshi’s worst enemies are their own guys. They, of course,
meant people in authority that matter. Upon inquiry, they mentioned the sad
saga of the tea industry. Last year, Bangladesh imported more tea than it had
exported. For someone like me, who is only a casual drinker of tea, and that
too, only when I have a sore throat, I had no clue what had happened to this
once-prosperous industry, which used to earn a major chunk of the foreign
exchange for Bangladesh. Not anymore!
The government,
in spite of serious objections coming from the tea growers and exporters, had
decided to move the tea auction house from Chittagong to Sreemangal, which is
located at the heart of tea plantation areas of Bangladesh. It is worth noting
here that an overwhelming majority of the tea gardens is in the Greater Sylhet
area (Sylhet, Moulvibazar and Habiganj), the remainders are in Chittagong and
Tetulia (south-eastern and north-western corners, respectively, of Bangladesh).
So, the choice of Sreemangal in the Moulvibazar would appear logical to most
outsiders. After all, almost 93% of the tea is grown in that north-east corner
of Bangladesh, adjacent to the Assam state of India. But I am told that the
reason for moving to Sreemangal had more to do with caving in and catering to
the interest of the tea producers association in India, or more specifically
the Tea Board of India. The Anti-Corruption Commission may like to investigate if
some kickbacks happened behind the scene.
For decades,
Cachar Tea had faced communication bottleneck simply because it is grown in the
state of Assam of India, which is a land-locked territory. Tea is grown in 36
thousand hectares in the three districts of Cachar, Karimganj and Hailakandi in
the Barak Valley. The gardens there produce about 50 million kg of tea,
commonly known as Cachar Tea. With the auction house now moved to next-door Sreemangal
inside Bangladesh the tea exporters in Assam don’t have to pay the hefty carrying
cost for export via warehouses and ports in Kolkata, and instead can dump their
produce inside Bangladesh via this newly opened channel. For years, because of
such constraints, Kachar Tea was less competitive and as such, non-threatening
for tea growers inside Bangladesh.
But now all
that is sure to change making Bangladeshi grown tea less competitive in the
world market. Unless corrective measures are taken, I am afraid that tea will
embrace the same fate as had visited jute decades earlier. That would be
undesirable for Bangladesh’s economy.
As I have
hinted above, there was a time when tea was a major exportable item from
Bangladesh. In the 1970s, tea export was next only to jute. It exported 80% of
its 40 million-kg production, consuming only 8 million kg inside. The
consumption of tea has steadily increased ever since, far surpassing the local
productivity level. For instance, Bangladesh produced approximately 60 million
kg last year (2013), but ended up importing 10 million kg from outside costing
Bangladesh Tk. 125 crore (Tk. 1.25 billion). Of this imported amount, 75% came
from India. The figures for the previous few years are not great either. In the
years 2010-2012, Bangladesh imported 2.9, 5.6 and 2.3 million kg of tea, respectively.
It is difficult
to believe today that Bangladesh used to earn tens of millions of USD from her
tea export, and now it is an importer of tea in order to meet the growing
demand inside from its tea drinkers whose numbers are increasing at an annual
growth rate of 3.5 to 5 percent.
Several factors
are responsible for the sad saga of the tea industry in Bangladesh. Of the
114,000 hectare area that is granted for tea plantation, less than half of it
is now under tea plantation as a result of the devastation suffered during the
1971 Liberation War. Of this planted area, only 30,000 hectare area can deliver
higher yield tea @ 1,400 kg per hectare, and the reminder 22,000-25,000 hectare
area @ 700 kg per hectare. Thanks to Mosharraf Hossain, an innovative tea grower
and executive who has shown how tea could be produced in plain land with proper
irrigation and how ordinary poor farmers rather than being tea workers can
actually own their small tea gardens in a cooperative farming, the yield in
Tetulia tea gardens is 3,000 kg per hectare, which is way above the national
average of 1176 kg/ha. However, Tetulia tea gardens comprise only a very small
fraction of the total plantation area and cannot affect the overall production
capacity to meet the ever growing consumer demand inside Bangladesh.
With perceived
health benefits coming from tea drinks, there is no doubt that the consumer
market is bound to grow not only inside Bangladesh but everywhere. Not only is
the number of consumers increasing, but also the per capita consumption is on
the rise. A study done in 2000-2001 also showed that world tea production had
grown by an annual increment of 3 % while in Bangladesh the production had
increased by only 1.84 % annually. Sadly, the picture is worse for the
subsequent years. Between 2001 and 2010 tea production in Bangladesh only
increased from 56.82 to 59.58 million kg annually, a dismal growth rate, while
the export shrunk from 12.92 to 0.91 million kg annually! Currently, only 30
countries produce tea to meet the growing global demand which runs in excess of
2.5 million metric tons yearly. Some of the newer producers with use of modern
techniques have been able to capture their piece of the pie while Bangladesh’s
share has been ever shrinking.
The government
of Bangladesh and its Tea Board must come up with a serious plan – both short
and long term - to salvage this industry. The use of modern machinery,
equipment, tools, improved irrigation and fertilizer, rehabilitation of soils,
pest surveillance and replanting by uprooting old tea plants, planting high
yield varieties of tea clones, and making use of unused land of the tea gardens
while improving the quality of tea overall (satisfying, e.g., the prescribed
criterion of the European countries in terms of the Maximum Residue Level value
of pesticides), and less bureaucracy would go a long way to saving this
vulnerable industry from collapse. Lest we forget, some one million Bangladeshis
(mostly women, and from the minority races) are directly tied up with tea
plantation and trade, let alone the fact that most of these hilly territories
are unsuitable to grow any other agricultural crop. If Bangladeshi tea cannot
compete pricewise with Indian or other imported tea, a huge majority of all
these people would join the poverty line, which is undesirable. It is their
survival which is at risk.
Remedial
measures must look into how to increase the yield from current average of only
1176 kg per hectare, which is far below the yield amongst the best in the
class. Kenya, which has the highest yield, and accounts for roughly 16% of
world tea export and 8% worldwide production, is estimated to produce more than
1900 kg per hectare. India, which
produces 29% of world production, accounting for approximately 15% world tea
export, has an average yield of more than 1700 kg per hectare. Sri Lanka,
another major player in tea export accounting for 12% of world market, has a
yield of more than 1400 kg per hectare. Bangladesh may like to identify the
causes behind the yield gaps against those more productive countries and
implement prudent solutions.
Bangladesh must
also review its ill-conceived decision to move the tea auction
house away from the port city of Chittagong to Sreemangal. This move does no
good to Bangladeshi tea growers and farmers, let alone the exporters, but
instead rewards India who would flood the market with her cheaper tea,
undercutting the cost of production and selling price inside Bangladesh for the
indigenous industry to remain profitable and thereby survive. The government
should also reevaluate its VAT and customs duty policy so that the indigenous
industry is not threatened by outside competition. The national interest should
and must take precedence over any other local interest.
1975
|
1980
|
1985
|
1990
|
1995
|
2000
|
2005
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2015
|
2020
|
|
Production
|
29.1
|
40
|
43.3
|
45.8
|
47.7
|
52.6
|
60.1
|
59.16
|
58.59
|
60.3
|
62.76
|
65.96
|
Consumption
|
5
|
9.1
|
13
|
18.9
|
22.3
|
34.5
|
51.1
|
61.06
|
63.98
|
62.6
|
64.89
|
73.5
|
Export
|
24.1
|
30.9
|
30.3
|
26.9
|
25.4
|
18.1
|
9
|
-1.9
|
-5.4
|
-2.3
|
-6.0
|
-7.54
|
Comments
Post a Comment