From Colonial Britain to Genocidal Israel, Western Colonialism as State Terrorism vs. Resistance as the Colonised's Way of Life, Plus PIPD Take-Aways.

While Terror (against the weak) is not exclusive to any human group, European colonisers (that is, land robbers & resource thieves,, race-faith supremacists & liars) add an Orwellian layer to Language

See my essay on looking at Israel through the bifocal lens of Adolf Hitler and Raphael Lemkin.

Nazis misappropriated swastika the ancient religious symbol of the Indic Civilization while Zionist Project (land thieving settler colonialist mission via ethnic cleansing) has misappropriated the Star of David. Both symbols will hence be forever tainted.

You got to give it to Nuremberg-worthy Class A White, Euro-supremacists of which Zionist Jews (with their Jewish Supremacist Israel in pursuit of “Mein Kampf in reverse”) are the most despicable version.

They captured both language and land.

In terms of global public narrative, these criminals of Anglo-American West who make up what the late C. R. Mills, the American sociologist at Columbia University who influenced a generation of anti-war Americans, called “the power elite” largely succeeded in falsely framing the emancipatory violence by the oppressed as “terrorism” while normalising and legitimising systemic vertical violence by the state as “legitimate” along the German statist nationalist Weberian line.

The USA-led War on Terror can be judged a colossal failure: for one, trillions of dollars spent on this quintessentially American bloodlust (largely against Muslim populations) have deprived 300 million ordinary citizens of their life’s essentials - food, shelter, medical care, and free education. Geopolitically, technologically and economically, the agrarian China has surpassed the State Terrorist American Empire in just about every aspect. The Global Majority of Humans have come to see the United States for what it is: Rogue and Terrorist State, no redeeming qualities. The propaganda shine of USA as a beacon of freedom and promoter of human rights is gone, forever.

Along with the United States and its irreversible loss of manufactured “moral standing” among the cluster of states what we call “The (collective) West” (belligerently imperialist, foundationally colonial, technologically advanced, politically democratic, culturally liberal and intellectually vibrant) is dead. Jesus may come back again, but this West is dead. As Hamid Dabashi argues, it is sheer savagery and it buried itself in Gaza, Israel’s Auschwitz.

There is no virtue or status or prestige in savagery or barbarism as we know it.

[I avoid using the term “family of nations” as there exists absolutely no love, affection or empathy in the World Order, past and present. (This family metaphor is a hold-over from the pathological feudalist thought from the bygone centuries where the Monarch with his Divine Right to rape or behead any of his serfs or subjects, was constructed as the Father of the Realm. Check out Wendy Brown’s brilliant work on this)].

Terrorism came to historic Palestine with the British whose morally creepy ruling class gave away the Holy Land of multi-ethnic and multifaith Palestine it did not have any effective colonial control or political authority, whatever that means, to the English branch of the Zionist banking dynasty of the Rothschilds in a brief letter on 2 November 1917. (Just google when the British succeeded in wrestling administrative control of Palestine from the dying Ottoman Empire). As a brief detour, not long ago at a private dinner hosted by Palestine Center, I enraged a group of high society (read imperialist) British people, (including the retired Archbishop and former President of Magdalen College, Cambridge Dr Rowen William, a couple of ex-Ambassadors (one of whom was a former ambassador to Tel Aviv and now heads Queens College, Cambridge and the other is a retired Provost at Cambridge) with my irreverent comment - that British ruling class is morally irresponsible and intellectually dishonest on Palestine.

The power elite of Britain then were ultimately responsible for the 100-years of Hell that Palestinians have lived.

Nobody from that circle spoke a word to me at the dinner afterwards, and I didn’t give a fuck what they thought of me and my words. I don’t do chit-chats about dogs, weather and food in polite society. I wasn’t there to curry favour with anyone nor did I want anything to do with Imperialists, liberal or hard core.

Let me repeat: there is no honour or virtue in any imperialist high society or any institutions they set up and run - for their own interests.

Here is the ideological bedrock of Eretz Israel (originally in Russian language), THE ultimate destination of ALL Zionists, settler colonisers, so clearly articulated by the Russian Zionist Jew Jabotinsky whom Netanyahu’s dead father, the Warsaw-born Zionist Jew named Benzion Mileikowsky, admired and worked for as a secretary.

For nationalists in Baghdad, Mecca and Damascus to agree to such an expensive contribution (agreeing to forego preservation of the Arab character of a country located in the center of their future “federation”) we would have to offer them something just as valuable. We can offer only two things: either money or political assistance or both. But we can offer neither. Concerning money, it is ludicrous to think we could finance the development of Iraq or Saudi Arabia, when we do not have enough for the Land of Israel. Ten times more illusionary is political assistance for Arab political aspirations. Arab nationalism sets itself the same aims as those set by Italian nationalism before 1870 and Polish nationalism before 1918: unity and independence. These aspirations mean the eradication of every trace of British influence in Egypt and Iraq, the expulsion of the Italians from Libya, the removal of French domination from Syria, Tunis, Algiers and Morocco. For us to support such a movement would be suicide and treachery. If we disregard the fact that the Balfour Declaration was signed by Britain, we cannot forget that France and Italy also signed it. We cannot intrigue about removing Britain from the Suez Canal and the Persian Gulf and the elimination of French and Italian colonial rule over Arab territory. Such a double game cannot be considered on any account.

Thus we conclude that we cannot promise anything to the Arabs of the Land of Israel or the Arab countries.

…

All of us, without exception, are constantly demanding that this power strictly fulfil its obligations. In this sense, there are no meaningful differences between our “militarists” and our “vegetarians.” One prefers an iron wall of Jewish bayonets, the other proposes an iron wall of British bayonets, the third proposes an agreement with Baghdad, and appears to be satisfied with Baghdad’s bayonets – a strange and somewhat risky taste’ but we all applaud, day and night, the iron wall. We would destroy our cause if we proclaimed the necessity of an agreement, and fill the minds of the Mandatory with the belief that we do not need an iron wall, but rather endless talks. Such a proclamation can only harm us. Therefore it is our sacred duty to expose such talk and prove that it is a snare and a delusion.

See The Iron Wall (We and the Arabs, 1923) https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/document/mideast/ironwall/ironwall.htm .

During the Arab Revolt against the British Rule (“Mandate”) in the 1930’s, the Brits were demolishing Arab homes in villages. Every completion of this crime by the British troops would be marked with an act of blowing the army bugle. The orally transmitted order by the British high command is “collective punishment”, something Himmler’s SS instituted in all Nazi concentration camps, again, another British contribution to Civilization (besides the original conception of apartheid), with every British killed by Arab resisters, an entire community nearest to the “crime scene” - more accurately, to the site of resistance - was to be demolished (or burned to the ground).

Then colonial Terrorist British administration met its match - in the more ruthless Terrorism perpetrated by Zionist Jewish settlers, led by ALL sectarian branches within the broadly Zionist movement. There wasn’t - and there still isn’t such a thing as a “good Zionist” alive. The irony is Zionists as political parasites were trained, financed and armed by the British colonial state against the restless natives of Palestine.

The Deir Yassin massacre: Why it still matters 75 years later

Source: https://forensic-architecture.org/investigation/executions-and-mass-graves-in-tantura-23-may-1948

In this Substack, I am cutting and pasting a list of items which I find most educational and information, from the rising Jewish Supremacist terrorism - fully backed by Israeli state - in the West Bank and the signs of Palestinian armed revolt there, however sporadic, in direct response to such State-backed terrorism to the fundamentally genocidal racist Germany and its warped and twisted unconditional support for Zionism and Zionist Israel, from the young Jewish writer’s scathing and empirical demolition of Zionism as an anti-human Fascism to the Palestine Institute for Public Diplomacy Take-aways this week.

Source: https://www.facebook.com/20531316728/posts/10154009990506729/

Source: The Evolution of Jewish Terrorism | The Oxford Handbook of the History of Terrorism | Oxford Academic

Source: https://www.facebook.com/reel/801470662988640

“In 1896, Theodor Herzl (the visionary Zionist ethnic cleanser) pitched the future state to the powers of Europe, describing it in his own words as "a rampart of Europe against Asia, an outpost of civilization as opposed to barbarism." Three years later, the movement established its financial foundation with the opening of the Jewish Colonial Trust. Then, in 1902, Herzl wrote to the empire-builder Cecil Rhodes seeking his blessing, explaining, "it is something colonial."

By 1923, Ze'ev Jabotinsky abandoned all euphemisms, writing:

"Zionist colonization must proceed regardless of the native population... behind an iron wall, which the native population cannot breach."

This system has a specific name: settler colonialism. Unlike a traditional empire that arrives merely to rule and eventually leave, the settler comes to stay and replace. As historian Patrick Wolfe wrote, it is "a structure, not an event," driven by the engine of native elimination.

Furthermore, this process does not stop at the land. As Frantz Fanon warned, the colonizer is never satisfied with taking fields and borders alone. Through a perverted logic, the colonizer turns toward the past—distorting, disfiguring, and destroying it.”

(Source: https://www.facebook.com/20531316728/posts/10154009990506729/)