Friday, November 1, 2019

Gross crimes of the Government of China in Uyghur

Male Chinese ‘Relatives’ Assigned to Uyghur Homes Co-sleep With Female ‘Hosts’
============
Male Han Chinese “relatives” assigned to monitor the homes of Uyghur families in northwest China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) regularly sleep in the same beds as the wives of men detained in the region’s internment camps, according to sources who have overseen the forced stayovers.

Since late 2017, Muslim—and particularly Uyghur—families in the XUAR have been required to invite officials into their homes and provide them with information about their lives and political views, while hosts are also subjected to political indoctrination.

The “Pair Up and Become Family” program is one of several repressive policies targeting Uyghurs in the region, which have also seen the build out of a vast network of camps, where authorities have held up to 1.5 million Uyghurs and other Muslim ethnic minorities accused of harboring “strong religious views” and “politically incorrect” ideas since April 2017.

RFA’s Uyghur Service recently spoke about the program with a ruling Communist Party cadre in Kashgar (in Chinese, Kashi) prefecture’s Yengisar (Yingjisha) county, who said that 70 to 80 families in the township he oversees have Chinese, mostly male, “relatives” that stay for up to six days at each household—many of which have male family members in detention.

“The ‘relatives’ come to visit us here every two months … they stay with their paired relatives day and night,” he said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

“They help [the families] with their ideology, bringing new ideas. They talk to them about life, during which time they develop feelings for one another.”

In addition to working and eating together, over the course of the week that they spend with their Uyghur hosts the officials even sleep in the same bed as family members, the cadre said, particularly during the winter.

“Normally one or two people sleep in one bed, and if the weather is cold, three people sleep together,” he said.

When asked whether any families have spoken out against male officials staying at their homes, particularly in situations where no male family members are present because they have been detained in camps, the cadre said that on the contrary, “they are very keen, and offer them whatever they have.”

“We also try to help them to make proper [sleeping] arrangements,” he said.

Reports suggest that Uyghurs who protest hosting “relatives” as part of the Pair Up and Become Family program, or refuse to take part in study sessions or other activities with the officials in their homes, are subject to additional restrictions or could face detention in the camp system.

According to the cadre, if a household does not have a bed, family members and “relatives” all sleep on the same sleeping platform, with a small amount of space between one another.

“If the width of the room is three meters (10 feet), the platform tends to be approximately two and half meters (eight feet),” he said.

“If everyone can fit, they all sleep there.”

The cadre said he had “never heard” of any situations in which male officials had attempted to take advantage of female members of the households they stayed in, and suggested “it is now considered normal for females to sleep on the same platform with their paired male ‘relatives.’”

The head of a local neighborhood committee in Yengisar county, who also declined to be named, confirmed that male officials regularly sleep in the same beds or sleeping platforms with female members of Uyghur households during their home stays.

“Yes, they all sleep on the same platform,” the committee chief said, adding that it is considered acceptable for “relatives” and hosts to keep a distance of one meter (three feet) between them at night.

No women have complained about the situation of co-sleeping, he said, and local officials have promoted the practice as a means by which to “promote ethnic unity.”

‘Forced assimilation’

According to New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW), in December 2017, authorities greatly expanded the October 2016 Pair Up and Become Family drive—which saw more than 100,000 officials visit mostly Uyghur homes in southern XUAR every two months—to mobilize more than a million cadres to spend a week living in homes, primarily in rural areas.

The “home stay” program was extended in early 2018 and cadres now spend at least five days every two months in the families’ homes, HRW said, adding that “there is no evidence to suggest that families can refuse such visits.”

Activities that take place during visits are documented in reports with accompanying photos—many of which can be found on the social media accounts of participating agencies—and show scenes of “relatives” involved in intimate aspects of domestic life, such as making beds and sleeping together, sharing meals, and feeding and tutoring children. There is no indication the families have consented to posting these images online.

HRW has called the home stays an example of “deeply invasive forced assimilation practices” and said they “not only violate basic rights, but are also likely to foster and deepen resentment in the region.”

Dolkun Isa, the president of the Munich-based World Uyghur Congress exile group, has said the “Pair Up and Become Family” campaign represents the “total annihilation of the safety, security and well-being of family members,” and that the program has “turned Uyghurs’ homes into prisons from which there is no escape.”

In July RFA spoke with a township and a village secretary in Hotan (Hetian) prefecture who both said that when “relatives” stay with their families to teach them the Chinese language and extol the virtues of Beijing’s policies in the region—often for around one week—they bring alcohol and meat that includes pork, and expect family members to consume them, against the principles of “halal” that govern what Muslims can eat and drink.

“We are not so insane as to tell them that we are Muslim, so we cannot eat the things they eat,” the secretary said at the time.

Nagaland demands autonomy from India


In this Wednesday, Oct. 30, 2019 photo, Neingulo Krome, 58, Secretary General of the Naga Peoples Movement for Human Rights, displays a Naga flag at his home in Kohima, capital of the northeastern Indian state of Nagaland. Naga groups are holding talks with the Indian government to bring an honorable solution to their demand for self determination. "The flag has always a symbol of our identity and freedom. Even as students, we used to celebrate Naga Independence Day on Aug. 14 with friends by hoisting the Naga flag in the jungles secretly because we did not want the flag to be snatched away by the army," Krome said. AP Photo

India's government and Naga rebel groups held talks Thursday on ending 70 years of armed insurrection in the country's troubled northeast, but did not sign a widely expected peace agreement.

Nagaland state's top elected official, Neiphiu Rio, said in a tweet that a breakthrough had been achieved in the talks in New Delhi, but gave no details.

He described the development as a "great joy for all Nagas and the nation as a whole," and said peace would pave the way for genuine progress and nation-building.
A home ministry statement, however, referred to anxiety among some groups about an agreement and said all stakeholders would be consulted and their concerns taken into account before any settlement is reached.

Read more here: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/nation-world/world/article236859708.html#storylink=cpy
It did not elaborate or say whether the government had accepted a contentious demand by one Naga faction for a separate flag and constitution.
A seven-member umbrella group of rebels, the Naga National Political Group, also participated in Thursday's talks.
Indian media reports said government negotiators had set Oct. 31 as a deadline for concluding the talks.
Separatist groups have been fighting the Indian government, accusing it of exploiting the region's rich natural resources while neglecting local development.
The Naga insurrection began in the mid-1950s with
rebel leaders seeking an independent homeland.
In 1997, after years of often-violent encounters between the rebels and security forces, the Indian government and the Isak-Muivah faction of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland signed a cease-fire agreement and started peace negotiations.

The rebel group watered down its original demand for an independent homeland and agreed to reach a solution under the Indian Constitution.

Read more here: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/nation-world/world/article236859708.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/nation-world/world/article236859708.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/nation-world/world/article236859708.html#storylink=cpy



Read more here: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/nation-world/world/article236859708.html#storylink=cpy


Israeli Soldier Gets Slap on the Wrist for Murder of Unarmed Child



An Israeli soldier was convicted for the death of a 15-year-old Palestinian boy during the Great March of Return protests last year at the border fence that separates the Gaza Strip from Israel. This soldier is the first Israeli to be convicted of anything since the protests began in March 2018.
Not surprisingly, this soldier was only sentenced to one month of labor, demoted to private, and was not convicted for murdering the boy, only for doing so without permission. The Israeli Defense Force (IDF) said in a statement, "The verdict indicates that on July 13, 2018, during a violent riot, the soldier fired at a Palestinian rioter who climbed the border fence opposite the Gaza Strip, without obtaining permission from his commanders while not following the rules of engagement or the instructions given to him earlier."
A video of the incident was uploaded to Twitter. The video shows 15-year-old Othman Helles barely get his two feet on the fence before he is shot dead. Helles is clearly unarmed, and cannot be taken as a serious threat to a soldier with a rifle and full body armor.
Since these protests began, children, paramedics, journalists, and disabled people have been killed by Israeli forces. The worst the protesters can do is hurl rocks across the fence or send burning kites, hardly a threat to the Israeli soldiers.
This conviction could just be a sorry attempt to appease the UN and other critics of the way the IDF has handled these protests. Since the first day of the Great March of Return, the UN has called for investigations into the massacres.
In February 2019, the UN released a report on their investigation into the killings. The UN concluded that "Israeli soldiers committed violations of international human rights and humanitarian law" and there was "no justification for Israel to shoot protesters with live ammunition."
March 30th 2018 was the first day of the Great March of Return. That day, 15 Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces. The next day the IDF tweeted, "Nothing was carried out uncontrolled; everything was accurate and measured, and we know where every bullet landed."
The UN report details some of the injuries and killings from that first day of protests, like this account of a 17-year-old’s slaying, "On 30 March, Israeli forces shot Ibrahim, a candy seller from Rafah, in the back of the head as he walked away, approximately 100 m from the separation fence, after he and his companion threw stones at Israeli soldiers. He died almost instantly." Shooting a teenager in the back of the head was "accurate and measured" according to the IDF.
On May 14th 2018, the U.S. Embassy officially opened in Jerusalem. Tens of thousands of Gazans marched at the border fence to protest the move, which turned into the deadliest day of the Great March of Return. 60 demonstrators were killed that day.
One of the most egregious killings happened the day of the embassy opening. According to the UN report, "Fadi, from Khan Younis, had had both legs amputated following an Israeli airstrike in 2008. On 14 May, Israeli snipers shot him in the chest at the Abasan Al-Jadida protest site, where he was sitting in his wheelchair with two friends approximately 300 m from the separation fence. He died immediately."
The UN report is full of gut-wrenching stories like this. And the only conclusion to draw from this one soldier’s conviction is that every other death, even the unarmed man in a wheelchair almost 1,000 feet from the fence, was done with permission from IDF commanders.
The Great March of Return still goes on every Friday. Why are so many Gazans willing to risk their lives every week? The protesters are not only demanding freedom of movement but also an end to the blockade enacted in 2007.
The small territory is home to almost two million people, one of the most densely populated places in the world. The blockade has shattered Gaza’s economy. By 2015, the GDP of the occupied territory had been cut in half. Currently, the unemployment rate is about 50 percent and around 70 percent for Gaza’s youth. The UN has said Gaza might be unlivable by 2020, mainly due to a lack of drinkable water.
The Islamist political party Hamas is blamed for the blockade, and serves as an easy scapegoat for both US and Israeli politicians. Hamas was democratically elected in 2006. After the election, Elliot Abrams, who served on George W. Bush’s National Security Council and is now President Trump’s envoy to Venezuela, met with Palestinian businessmen and advocated for a "hard coup" against Hamas.
Fatah, the political rival of Hamas, was armed by the US and Israel to overthrow the government of Hamas. Fatah failed in their coup attempt, but the real losers were the people of Gaza. The violence between the two parties was the excuse used to put the draconian blockade on the occupied territory.
The victory of Hamas in Gaza was not all bad for Israeli officials. A WikiLeaks cable from 2007 reveals that Amos Yadin, who was the director of the IDF’s intelligence branch at the time, said, "Israel would be ‘happy’ if Hamas took over Gaza because the IDF could then deal with Gaza as a hostile state."
The state of Israel would not be able to operate with such impunity without the undying support of the US government. Thanks to lavish lobbying campaigns, even questioning that support in the halls of Congress is considered anti-Semitic.
Both the House and Senate have recently introduced legislation to ban the sale of crowd-control to munitions to Hong Kong law enforcement. Since June, massive protests have rocked Hong Kong. Although the protests have turned violent, no demonstrators have been killed by Hong Kong police. Yet, US lawmakers are quick to make legislation siding with the protesters. Imagine the reaction from Washington if police were slaughtering people in the streets of Hong Kong?
The people of Gaza will continue to march for their most basic human rights. The international community may cry foul, but as long as the premier empire supports Israel, they can operate without any real consequences. The one month sentence this soldier received is a slap in the face to the families of those murdered at the fence. What will it take to bring these families justice?

More than 100,000 people killed in Yemen war

More than 100,000 people have died as a result of the war in Yemen, according to an explosive new report by an American NGO.
Based on data collected from a variety of sources, including the United Nations, the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data project (ACLED) said the death toll from the four-year-long war was considerably higher than most previous estimates.
Out of the over 100,000 people estimated to have been killed since a Saudi-led coalition intervened in Yemen's war in 2015 against the Houthi movement, at least 12,000 civilians were killed in direct attacks, the ACLED said.
Already, 2019 has so far been the second deadliest year of the conflict, with more than 20,000 deaths reported. By 2020, ACLED estimated that 102,000 will have been killed as a direct result of violence.
The Saudi-led coalition first intervened in Yemen in March 2015 after Houthi rebels seized control of the capital Sanaa and began closing in on Aden, prompting President Abd Rabbuh Mansour Hadi to flee to Riyadh.
Yemen 'peace' deal is a fragile truce between Saudi Arabia and the UAE
Read More »
The fighting has driven million to the brink of famine in what has been deemed the world's worst humanitarian crisis by the UN.
According to ACLED, Saudi Arabia and its allies have been responsible for the vast majority of civilian casualties in Yemen.
The report said around 67 percent of all reported civilian fatalities have been caused by coalition airstrikes, with over 8,000 killed in direct targeting.
As part of a deal agreed earlier in the year seeking to end the conflict, the Houthis have offered to halt all attacks on Saudi Arabia.
The offer came after the rebel group, which is supported by Iran, claimed responsibility for attacks on 14 September against two key Saudi oil installations that temporarily knocked out half of the OPEC giant's production.
Despite the Houthis' admitting responsibility, Riyadh and Washington have blamed Iran for the attacks, a charge denied by Tehran.
There was also a tentative peace deal agreed last week between Saudi Arabia and southern separatists.
The separatist Southern Transitional Council (STC), which is backed by the UAE and has fought the Houthis, has come into conflict with the Saudi-backed Yemeni government in recent months, taking control of the city of Aden in August.
South Yemen was an independent country before being forcibly unified in 1990, and the STC has expressed a desire for independence again.
The new deal would see the STC handed a number of ministries and the Hadi government returned to Aden, according to reports.

The Hidden Toll of Local Revenue: How Bangladesh’s District Administration Is Forced Into Corruption

By Habib Siddiqui (Based on information shared by senior public servants who requested anonymity) Bangladesh’s citizens often imagine the...