Reform at the UN vitally required to stop world disorder
By Habib Siddiqui
The United Nations Organization, like the
League of Nations before, was conceived for the noble purpose of ending wars between
nations. Yet, we have witnessed, almost non-stop, one war after another. Since
the end of the Second World War in 1945 there have been some 250 major wars in
which over 50 million people have been killed, tens of millions made homeless,
and countless millions injured and bereaved.
In the history of warfare the twentieth century stands out as the bloodiest and most brutal - three times more people have been killed in wars in the last ninety years than in all the previous five hundred years. No part of the world has escaped the scourge of war. Thanks to the war industry and merchants of death there is nowhere that modern weapons or armies cannot reach.
In the history of warfare the twentieth century stands out as the bloodiest and most brutal - three times more people have been killed in wars in the last ninety years than in all the previous five hundred years. No part of the world has escaped the scourge of war. Thanks to the war industry and merchants of death there is nowhere that modern weapons or armies cannot reach.
Here is a short list (and by no means an
all comprehensive one): the Chinese Civil War (1946-49), the Greek Civil War
(1946-49), the Korean War (1950-53), the Algerian war of independence from France
(1954-62), the Vietnam War (1954-75), the Arab-Israel wars (1948-49, 1967,
1973), the DRC wars (1964-2002), India-Pakistan wars (1965, 1973), Cambodia
wars (1967-98), the Ethiopian Civil War (1974-1991), Cambodia-Vietnam War
(1975-89), the Lebanese Civil War (1975-1990), the invasion of Afghanistan by
the Soviets (1978-92), Iraq-Iran war (1980-88), the invasion of Lebanon by
Israel (1982), the Falkland Islands War (1982), Sri Lanka Civil War
(1983-2009), the civil wars in Afghanistan in the post-Soviet Era followed by
invasion by the USA and its NATO Allies in the aftermath of 9/11 (2001-to-date),
the First Gulf War (1991), Nagorno-Karabakh
War (1988-94),
the Balkan Wars
in which the Serbs attacked the Bosnians (1992-95) and the Kosovars (1998-99), Russian
invasion of the breakaway Republic of Chechnya, the Bush-Blair illegal war on
Iraq (2003-11), and the Libyan and the civil wars in Yemen and Syria with
foreign players.
Our ancestors said ‘no’ to the Holocaust,
and yet genocide became a reality in the Balkans for the Muslim Bosnians and
Kosovars who were massacred simply because of their religion in the 1990s. In
Rwanda we saw a similar genocide in 1994 against the ethnic Tutsis. Rohingya
Muslims and Hindus in Buddhist Myanmar (formerly Burma) continue to be killed
for their ethnic and religious identities due to on-going genocide against them
since at least General Ne Win’s time when he came to power in 1962.
In his must-read article “How to Fix the U.N.—and Why We Should” in the Foreign Policy (September 26, 2018), Turkish President Recep Erdogan
said, “The main reason for the U.N.’s current troubles is the Security Council’s failure to keep its promise of promoting peace and security
around the world. From Bosnia and Rwanda to Syria, Yemen, and Palestine, the
U.N.’s top decision-making body has neither prevented atrocities nor brought to
justice those responsible for heinous crimes. On the U.N.’s watch,
authoritarian regimes around the world have used conventional weapons and
weapons of mass destruction against innocent civilians. Some regimes have even
carried out genocide without facing consequences. The U.N. has also failed the
millions of children who suffer from extreme poverty and malnutrition and, as
Turkey knows all too well, has been unable to take necessary steps to ease the suffering
of refugees.”
It has become difficult for religious minorities in many parts
of our world. With the fascists and religious bigots in power in places like
India, Myanmar, the Philippines and some parts of Europe the lives of hundreds
of millions of minorities, esp. Muslims, have been marginalized. Freedom-seeking
Kashmiris continue to be killed in Narendra Modi’s India.
Just as we have witnessed before in the Rakhine (formerly
Arakan) state of Myanmar with Muslim-sounding names of towns and places being replaced,
India is doing its own branding. Recently, Adityanath Yogi, the Chief Minister
of UP, has changed the name of famous city of UP, Allahabad to Prayagraj.
Earlier Yogi had made many changes in the names like that of Mughal sarai to
Pundit Deendayal
Upadhayay Junction (named now after a RSS fascist), Urdu Bazar to Hindi
Bazar, Ali Nagar to Arya Nagar, Miya Bazar as Maya Bazar, Islampur as Ishwarpur, Humayun Nagar as Hanuman
Nagar, etc. He
regards all Muslim-sounding names as being alien.
In an interview Yogi said he has to change many more names. On
his agenda is to change the name Taj Mahal to Ram
Mahal, Azamgarh to Aryamgarh and to cap it all, as per him, the name India in the
constitution should be changed to Hindustan.
In China, millions of Muslims and Christians continue to
suffer because of their religion. In Xinjiang (formerly East Turkestan) the Chinese local governments have ordered
pepper spray, handcuffs and electric cattle prods for Uighur internment
centers. Restrictions have long been placed on Muslims in Xinjiang for the
basic Islamic practices of performing prayers, fasting during Ramadan, consumption
of halal food, wearing of headscarves by women and growing of beards by men.
Forget about
Muslims, even the minority Jews are not safe in Trump’s America. On the Saturday
morning of Oct. 27, 2018 eleven Jewish Americans were killed as they came to pray
at a synagogue in Pittsburgh. Six others were injured. The terrorist 46-year-old Robert Bowers, who has been arrested after gun
shootout with the police, reportedly wrote in the social media, "HIAS likes to bring in invaders
that kill our people," referring to a Jewish refugee advocacy group that
held a National Refugee Shabbat last weekend. Cesar Sayoc, the suspect who was
arrested on Friday in connection with a series of suspicious explosive packages
that were sent to top Democrats and CNN, is a die-hard supporter of Trump who
attended a 2017 rally for President Trump.
Apparently, Trump’s hateful rhetoric against
immigrants have energized the white supremacists as never before in recent
history of the USA.
What is America
coming to and where is it heading to?
Thousands of Central American migrants, including men, women and
entire families, are walking through southern Mexico, in the hope of reaching the USA. Low pay, rising prices
for basics such as food, water and electricity and extortion demands from the
local gang had made it impossible to make ends meet for most Honduran migrants.
A few Nicaraguan families in the group are fleeing their country to escape
political unrest and the violent government crackdown which has claimed more than 300 lives. Not too long ago, we have seen similar mass migrations
from war-torn countries of Asia and Africa to Europe.
It goes without
saying that if war and its threats between nations could be avoided, humanity
would have a much better chance of surviving and prospering. Instead, it is
insanely thought that conflict
between nations can be resolved with war. But, none wins in a war except those involved in arms sales. It is no
accident that many of the veto-wielding countries are the biggest arms sellers.
Disorder and war between nations help the ‘merchants of death’ to maximize
their profits. Weapons are not cheap either. In order to be prepared for war,
governments are induced to buying weapons at an exorbitant price from the arms
industry, which is enjoying bonanza years in the last few decades. So, while their people starve and suffer from
all kinds of deprivations, a huge percentage of their budget is allocated to
the purchase of arms.
Since at least 9/11, the UN, which is supposed to be our
heartbeat, has been seen more as an organization that is either abused or
manipulated by veto-wielding powers to serve their selfish interests than being
an arbiter of peace and security for all nationals. It’s perceived weak against
rogue nations that try to exploit the U.N.’s weaknesses to
undermine the liberal international order. Take, for example, the case of
Myanmar murderous regime that continues to be protected inside the UNSC by its
big brother – China, and the case of Syria’s Assad regime enjoying similar
protection from Russia. Remember, how President Bush Jr and his Secretary Powell
misled the world community to justify US’s illegal war against Iraq in 2003?
Consider also, the recent decision by Trump to withdraw from the U.N. Human
Rights Council; to pull out of UNESCO, the U.N. body for educational,
scientific, and cultural collaboration; and to cut funding to UNRWA, the U.N.
relief agency for Palestinians.
I am glad to note that some wise world
leaders like Dr. Mahathir Mohammad of Malaysia, Recep Erdogan of Turkey and Dr.
Hassan Rouhani of Iran are speaking out in favor of a fundamental change in the
UN to get us out of the vicious cycles of war and making the UN more
democratic.
In his speech at the UNGA in September 2018,
Dr. Mahathir said that wars are legitimizing killings and wanton
destruction of everything. What is worse: “the killings are regarded as noble,
and the killers are hailed as heroes. They get medals stuck to their chest and
statues erected in their honor, have their names mentioned in history books. There is something wrong with our way of
thinking, with our value system. Kill one man, it is murder, kill a million and
you become a hero.”
Dr. Mahathir said that a reform in the UN
organization is needed. He concluded, “Five countries on the basis of their
victories 70 over years ago cannot claim to have a right to hold the world to
ransom forever. They cannot take the moral high ground, preaching democracy and
regime change in the countries of the world when they deny democracy in this
organization.” He suggested that “the veto should not be by just one permanent
member but by at least two powers backed by three non-permanent members of the
Security Council. The General Assembly should then back the decision with a
simple majority.”
President Erdogan wrote, “At a time when global leadership is desperately
needed, it is crucial to improve the United Nations rather than destroy it. If
the great powers are unwilling to assume responsibility; if a handful of
countries that reap the benefits of the existing international system do not
want to commit to reform; and if some of the U.N.’s architects, including the
United States, continue to damage multilateralism by taking increasingly
unilateralist steps, it will be time to redefine global leadership. We must end
the monopoly of a small number of nations and promote the collective leadership
of countries that aim to resolve key global challenges. If the great powers
prove unwilling or unable to act, the community of nations—under the umbrella
of the United Nations or other organizations—must do what is necessary.” He
recommended that the monopoly of the Big 5 within the UNSC be abolished by
increasing the number of its members to 20.
Inviting the US to
return to the JCPOA instead of imposing sanctions and throwing threats, in his
address to the UN General Assembly, the Iranian President Hassan Rouhani lambasted
the US disrespect for its international obligations, citing examples of US and
its allies’ wrong policies across the world, especially in the Middle East. He
said, “The world is suffering from the recklessness and disregard of
some states for international values and institutions. The message of our
presence here is that the preservation of interests and security in the world
in the least costly manner is solely possible through the cooperation of, and
coordination among, countries. However, it is unfortunate that we are
witnessing rulers in the world who think they can secure their interests
better—or at least in the short-term ride public sentiments and gain popular
support—through the fomenting of extremist nationalism and racism, and though
xenophobic tendencies resembling a Nazi disposition, as well as through the trampling
of global rules and undermining international institutions; even through
preposterous and abnormal acts such as convening a high-level meeting of
the Security Council.”
Rouhani said
that one cannot aspire to securing more peace and security at the cost of
denying others’ peace and security. “We should not allow the breathing space
for and growth of the line of thinking that holds others to ransom through the
artificial creation of insecurity.”
He said, “We
support peace and democracy in the entire Middle East. We consider nuclear knowledge an imperative and nuclear
weapons prohibited.” “The most pressing crisis in the Middle East, however,
is the question of Palestine. The passage of time cannot – and must not
–justify occupation. The innumerable crimes of Israel against the Palestinians
would not have been possible without the material and military assistance, and
political and propaganda support of the United States. Israel, equipped with a
nuclear arsenal and blatantly threatening others with nuclear annihilation,
presents the most daunting threat to regional and global peace and stability.”
In his speech at the UNGA, President Erdogan said, “We believe that when we
say, ‘The World Is Bigger Than 5’, we become the voice of the common conscience
of the entire human race.” He asked: “Why should not all 194 countries in the
world - in a rotational manner - have a permanent seat at the UN Security
Council?”
“Limiting the reform of
the United Nations to the budget only, will neither contribute to the solution
of real problems, nor will it make anybody happy. There is a need for
increasing the efficiency of this organization, which I deem very important for
the future of the world, on its fundamental areas of duty which are security,
development and social equality,” President Erdogan underscored.
“To ensure a peaceful
and secure future for all, we have a duty to succeed in bringing the
humankind’s struggle, starting with the pursuit of justice, to a conclusion
with the establishment of justice. Today, if the assets of the wealthiest 62
people in the world amount to the assets of the half of world’s population of
3.6 billion people, then there is a significant problem that we need to do
something about. If there exist 821 million people in the world that fall
asleep hungry at night while 672 million are diagnosed with obesity, then there
is a problem. If 258 million people across different geographies leave their
places in search for more humane conditions and 68 million people are
forcefully displaced, then there is a problem. If a baby born in Africa is nine
times more likely to die in the first months of his/her life than a baby born
here in this city, then there is a problem. Rumi, a shining beacon from Konya
at the heartland of Anatolia which enlightens all souls across the world, said
that justice means “bestowing things in its proper place,” meaning giving
someone what he or she is due. Let us “bestow rights in its proper place” and
make the United Nations the voice and implementer of the humankind’s
expectation for justice. Let us establish a global administrative system that
will serve as a shield to protect the downtrodden, lend a helping hand to the
hungry and unsheltered, and fill future generations with hope,” President Erdogan
said.
Underscoring that all
that is said from the UNGA’s podium, all the analyses and proposals, can only
make sense if they are put into action, President Erdogan said: “Likewise,
according to Rumi, a cruel person is the one who does not fulfill his or her
duties. If we want to make the United Nations the source of justice instead of
cruelty, we have to dedicate ourselves more fully to the tasks bestowed upon
us.”
Our world without the UN would be
disastrous. We need it. However, as eloquently stated by the above cited world
leaders of our time, it needs critical reforms to be an effective global entity
that is respected by all, and seen as just and serious arbiter of peace, and
comes to the aid of the oppressed people against the oppressive powers, and is
not seen as a platform to justify the crimes of the nuclear Brahmins and
gangsters that have thus far rendered it useless.
Only by democratizing the global institute
can such aspirations be met. Will the Gang of 5 allow such reforms?
Comments
Post a Comment