Tuesday, February 8, 2022

America, NATO and Russia: Why War and Not Peace?

 By Mahboob Khawaja, PhD

Editor's Note

Troops mass on the borders, and ordinance by the cargo plane lands in Ukraine. The world is nervous about starting WWIII while Ukrainians have already been fighting since 2014. No one says it, but the U.S. is neither hero nor savior here and was actively involved in the actions that lead to the Russians reintegrating Crimea. The U.S. did not like the Russian-leaning Ukrainian administration and stirred the pot to overthrow it. This was not a new tactic by the United States. It has been the standard modus operandi for decades – regardless of what party held the White House. The decisions made have little concern about either what is good for the Ukrainians, or what they might want. U.S. intervention is ALWAYS about U.S. interests, and at the top of those interests here is to maintain a military noose around Russia.

Putin is no angel. He is a dictator with a stranglehold on power. He apparently wants to reacquire the Soviet satellite nations to Russian interest if not control. I believe this is in part to provide a buffer between the “West” and Russia. Not in terms of influence, but because the U.S. has a ring of missiles around the borders of Russia. Having friendly buffer states would force those emplacements further from Russia. And hence the struggle over “influence” in Ukraine.

The U.S. does not intervene anywhere unless it suits U.S. “interests”. Those interests are generally either resources, transport routes, or corporate interests. That includes Ukraine. There is little, if any, concern for the Ukrainians or their needs and desires. But what happens here may be the start of major conflict – even WWIII. And yes, the same threat of WWIII exists in the Middle East and even Africa in the near future. The whole planet is a tinder box both literally and figuratively which is all the more reason to be building trust and cooperative relations rather than militancy (no matter how profitable war is for some).

We are living in what is called the “information age”, but for the most part, we are tremendously uninformed. We, at best, get slices and snapshots, and those are contextualized in generally unhelpful ways. I offer the featured picture for this article. It is of a stream in the Carpathian Mountains in Ukraine. Ukraine is not some grey place lost in the mists of the 1940s. It is a beautiful and vibrant place with humans living with the same desires of humans everywhere and dealing with the same problems – like this pandemic. Ukrainians deserve to be able to take a deep breath and hug their loved ones without the fear of a major conflagration flattening their homes.

Let us make peace with the same fervor we have made war.

Mahboob Khawaja, PhD

Immanuel Kant, the German philosopher wrote in Critique of Practical Reason, imperative of moral human conduct requires to “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means”.

The ongoing war syndrome between America, NATO, and Russia typifies what can go wrong when human thinking evolution is restricted to imaginary temptations and compulsions of animosities. Often myth of war is manifested in self-interest and its evolution becomes unquestionable on the rational screen of reason and moral values. We see immature leadership surrounding conditions of egoism and primacy of will to clarify the reality of warfare. As of this moment, there is no emerging war on the ground,  alleged “aggression” or dynamic syntax of compelling move to unleash war either by Russia against Ukraine or Russia vs. America and NATO. Rationally speaking, the myth of contemporary ground warfare is incomprehensible to an outsider. The mass media propaganda appears to set the psychological conditions of “Russian war” and “aggressions” without realizing its real-world effects, it spreads frightening waves of fear and hatred across the globe.

Is media propaganda a weapon of the conquest of human minds, souls, and future-making? The imaginary foresight of any futuristic war captions the secret of the unknown and unthinkable. All wars have consequences. Global humanity is not over the aftermath of even the 2nd WW as books, live stories and movies are constantly haunting the human intellect. What were the motives of the 2nd WW and why did Europeans kill each other by the millions and destroy human habitats? Those who had planned and carried out the war atrocities have long disappeared and can’t be held accountable for their crimes against humanity.

Scott Ritter (is a former Marine Corps intelligence officer who served in the former Soviet Union implementing arms control treaties, in the Persian Gulf during Operation Desert Storm, and in Iraq overseeing the disarmament of WMD): “What War with Russia Look Like”  (Global Research: 01/11/2022): explains the irony of current affairs:

If the U.S. tries to build up NATO forces on Russia’s western frontiers in the aftermath of any Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russia will then present Europe with a fait accompli in the form of what would now be known as the “Ukrainian model.” In short, Russia will guarantee that the Ukrainian treatment will be applied to the Baltics, Poland, and even Finland, should it be foolish enough to pursue NATO membership.

Is There Irony in Political Wickedness and the Paradox of Egoism?

If you know the nature of warmongering, you will certainly know yourself from the annals of formative history. Are we, the People of the 21st century, a knowledge-based age detached from the Nature of Things – who we are and where we are? How would one rationalize the role and actions of NATO in a global theater of strategic interests? The history of NATO and its plans and ideological motives are equally distorted and disfigured on the global screen of reason, honesty and accountability. NATO lost its importance by siding with the US for its invasion and participation in wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. The current tensions draw divergent and conflicting perceptions and order of wisdom to analyze its short and long-term impacts.

All political configurations carry much evil and much good in any rational optimistic outlook. Russia embarked on a massive military buildup on the Ukrainian border to ensure its security. Its impact is alarming to most NATO allies assuming an imminent attack on Ukraine. Not so, deny most Russian officials, it is an exercise on Russian territory. American-led NATO believes it is a challenge to its vulnerability and strategic presence in the region. How to analyze the intentions in a knowledge-based strategic foresight? True knowledge is always benevolent, not concealing or retaliating. America and NATO reacting to a tense situation require logical clarification of hidden intentions. If time and history are a reference point, those obsessed with invincible armies cannot solve the emerging political crises.

Is Russia exercising its own right to hold usual military drills? There is no alleged “aggression” or any hostile acts performed so far against the Ukraine sovereignty.  America and West Europeans are keen to strike a balancing act by stationing their troops to the adjacent East European countries to remind the Russian of any consequences if they strike at Ukraine. If we are open to adaptability and an enlightened fortitude and respect for a state’s sovereignty, could Russia be helping Ukraine to strengthen its strategic capacity and telling the US-led NATO to be aware that Russia has strong defensive capacity in all emerging and unusual situations?  Russia, NATO, and America cannot possibly be participants in a self-destructive formula. Rationality finds it hard to determine what Russia can or will gain if Ukraine is attacked. Is it a puzzle game launched by the policymakers on both sides of the iron curtain?

Often crises have multiple spillover agendas. President Putin and President Zellensky of Ukraine could be meeting at Beijing Winter Olympics this week. Both know well their future survival lives in peace and harmony, not in conflict-making or conflict-keeping. German Chancellor and French President Macron are active to bring both sides to some diplomatic resolution. President Endogen (Turkey) has offered Russia and Ukraine to hold peace talks in Ankara. Could America-NATO be surprised if Putin and Zellensky come to a meeting of mind and sign a diplomatic peace agreement?  Both nations share a rich geography and history together. Could we witness the coming of a new age of relationship between Russia, Ukraine, and an America-led NATO when even most exemplary political vigilance could be liable to unusual surprises?

Leaders with Reason Think Before They Act

The voices of reason are loud and clear as global humanity cannot suffer the penalties of tyranny and war-mongering.  It is wasting our time and consuming our precious thoughts and energies for man-made insidious cruelty. We, the People live in a splendid Universe in which planet Earth floats ordained by the commands of God. We are moral beings, unlike animals that possess the eyes, ears, and other senses but cannot draw logical conclusions from their senses. We, the People, draw rational results from what we see and what we hear, therefore, we are different, and we cannot act or live animals. There is a moral sense of spirituality and humanity to coexist in harmony with the rest of all creations on this Earth. Modern wars represent sadistic and cruel minds to undermine human rights, dignity and life. They destroy all that is built over the ages that we call human civilizations. All of the Abrahamic Faiths (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) reveal the truth of “Trust” – human beings took to be responsible and be at peace with the Nature of Things.  Any favorite perversion would contradict this Trust and embark on killing and destruction of human habitats as history has witnessed during the Two WW, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and ongoing in Yemen. This TRUST and its reminder are explicitly mentioned in (The Qur’an, Chapter 33: 72):

 “We did indeed offer the Trust to the Heavens and the Earth; And the mountains but they refused; To undertake it, being afraid thereof: But man undertook it; He was indeed unjust and foolish.” 

The Earth is a living entity and is meant for us – human beings. We, the People, wonder who else except God created life, the Earth, and the living Universe floating in space well balanced and functional since time immemorial. Who else other than God determined the Earth spinning of 1670 km per hour? Who other than God ordained it to orbit the sun at 107,000 km per hour?  And who else than God made it to spin at 28,437 km per hour at the equator? (https://www.newscientist.com/question/fastearthspin/#ixzz7C8p37S9X).    Be aware that earth average distance to the Sun is about 93 million miles (105 million km); the distance of the Moon from Earth is currently 384,821 km equivalent to 0.002572 Astronomical Units and if the distance between the Earth-Sun or the Earth-moon were ever to change, there will be no sign of life or habitats left on Earth.

We, the People, wish to rejoice in truth, not evil. We, the people of the world, enjoin focused minds and imagination to articulate a new world of One Humanity, brotherhood, and peaceful co-existence amongst all, free of hatred, fear, wars, encroachment, and animosity. We, the people of the globe possess understanding – how to change the egoistic and embittered insanity of the few hate-mongers and warlords into an equilibrium of balanced relationship between Man, Life, and God-given the living Universe in which we reside all.

 


Dr. Mahboob A. Khawaja specializes in global security, peace and conflict resolution with keen interests in Islamic-Western comparative cultures and civilizations, and author of several publications including: Global Peace and Conflict Management: Man and Humanity in Search of New Thinking. Lambert Publishing Germany, May 2012. His forthcoming book is entitled: One Humanity and The Remaking of Global Peace, Security and Conflict Resolution

 



No comments:

Post a Comment

PM Tarique Rahman’s trip stalled: What it means for Bangladesh-India ties

  New Delhi, India – Bangladesh’s Prime Minister Tarique Rahman’s first trip to India has been put on hold, highlighting the strained ties ...